Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them

被引:875
作者
Spielman, D
Brook, BW
Frankham, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Key Ctr Biodivers & Bioresouces, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Charles Darwin Univ, Key Ctr Trop Wildlife Management, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Trop Biol, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolut Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Program Evolut Dynam, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0403809101
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There is controversy concerning the role of genetic factors in species extinctions. Many authors have asserted that species are usually driven to extinction before genetic factors have time to impact them, but few studies have seriously addressed this issue. If this assertion is true, there will be little difference in genetic diversity between threatened and taxonomically related nonthreatened species. We compared average heterozygosities in 170 threatened taxa with those in taxonomically related nonthreatened taxa in a comprehensive metaanalysis. Heterozygosity was lower in threatened taxa in 77% of comparisons, a highly significant departure from the predictions of the no genetic impact hypothesis. Heterozygosity was on average 35% lower (median 40%) in threatened taxa than in related nonthreatened ones. These differences in heterozygosity indicate lowered evolutionary potential, compromised reproductive fitness, and elevated extinction risk in the wild. Independent evidence from stochastic computer projections has demonstrated that inbreeding depression elevates extinction risk for threatened species in natural habitats when all other threatening processes are included in the models. Thus, most taxa are not driven to extinction before genetic factors affect them adversely.
引用
收藏
页码:15261 / 15264
页数:4
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] When does conservation genetics matter?
    Amos, W
    Balmford, A
    [J]. HEREDITY, 2001, 87 (3) : 257 - 265
  • [2] Bijlsma R, 1999, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V12, P1125, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00113.x
  • [3] Bijlsma R, 2000, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V13, P502, DOI 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00177.x
  • [4] Brook BW, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
  • [5] Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression
    Byers, DL
    Waller, DM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1999, 30 : 479 - 513
  • [6] ECOLOGICAL AND GENETIC-FACTORS IN CONSERVATION - A CAUTIONARY TALE
    CARO, TM
    LAURENSON, MK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1994, 263 (5146) : 485 - 486
  • [7] DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
    CAUGHLEY, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (02) : 215 - 244
  • [8] Inbreeding depression in the wild
    Crnokrak, P
    Roff, DA
    [J]. HEREDITY, 1999, 83 (3) : 260 - 270
  • [9] Dobson AP, 1999, GENETICS AND THE EXTINCTION OF SPECIES, pXIII
  • [10] Inbreeding and extinction in island populations: a cautionary note
    Elgar, MA
    Clode, D
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) : 284 - 286