Does Emergency Medical Dispatch Priority Predict Delphi Process-Derived Levels of Prehospital Intervention?

被引:23
作者
Sporer, Karl A. [1 ,2 ]
Craig, Alan M. [3 ]
Johnson, Nicholas J. [4 ]
Yeh, Clement C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] San Francisco Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Serv, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
[3] Toronto Emergency Med Serv, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
ambulance; ambulance utilization; emergency; classification of emergencies; Emergency Medical Dispatch; emergency medical service communication standards; emergency medical service communication systems; emergency medical services; emergency medical services standards; emergency medical services utilization; risk assessment; standards; triage;
D O I
10.1017/S1049023X00008244
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) is an emergency medical dispatch system widely used to prioritize 9-1-1 calls and optimize resource allocation. This study evaluates whether the assigned priority predicts a Delphi process-derived level of prehospital intervention in each emergency medical dispatch category. Methods: All patients given a MPDS priority in a suburban California county from 2004-2006 were included. A Delphi process of emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in another system developed the following categories of prehospital treatment representing increasing acuity, which were adapted for this study: advanced life support (ALS) intervention, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical. The sensitivities and specificities of MPDS priority for level of prehospital intervention were determined for each MPDS category. Likelihood ratios of low and high priority dispatch codes for the level of prehospital intervention also were calculated for each MPDS category. Results: A total of 65,268 patients met inclusion criteria, representing 61% of EMS calls during the study period. The overall sensitivities of high-priority dispatch codes for ALS, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical interventions were 83% (95% confidence interval 83-84%), 83% (82-84%), and 94% (92-96%). Overall specificities were: ALS, 32% (31-32%); ALS-Stat, 31% (30-31%); and ALS-Critical 28% (28-29%). Compared to calls assigned to a low priority, calls with high-priority dispatch codes were more likely to receive ALS interventions by 22%, ALS-Stat by 20%, and ALS-Critical by 32%. A low priority dispatch code decreased the likelihood of ALS interventions by 48%, ALS-Stat by 45%, and ALS-Critical by 80%. Among high-priority dispatch codes, the rates of interventions were: ALS 26%, ALS-Stat 22%, and ALS-Critical 1.5%, all of which were significantly greater dian low-priority calls (p < 0.05) [ALS 13%, ALS-Stat 11%, and ALS-Critical 0.2%]. Major MPDS were categories with high sensitivities (> 95%) for ALS interventions included breathing problems, cardiac or respiratory arrest/death, chest pain, stroke, and unconscious/fainting; these categories had an average specificity of 3%. Medical Priority Dispatch System categories such as back pain, unknown problem, and traumatic injury had sensitivities for ALS interventions < 15%. Conclusions: The MPDS is moderately sensitive for the Delphi process derived ALS, ALS-Stat, and ALS-Critical intervention levels, but non-specific. A low MPDS priority is predictive of no prehospital intervention. A high priority, however, is of little predictive value for ALS, ALS-Stat, or ALS-Critical interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 317
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bailey E D, 2000, Prehosp Emerg Care, V4, P186, DOI 10.1080/10903120090941489
[2]  
Calle P, 1995, Eur J Emerg Med, V2, P128
[3]   ACCURACY OF DETERMINING CARDIAC-ARREST BY EMERGENCY MEDICAL DISPATCHERS [J].
CLARK, JJ ;
CULLEY, L ;
EISENBERG, M ;
HENWOOD, DK .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (05) :1022-1026
[4]  
Clawson J, 2008, RESUSCITATION
[5]   Ability of the Medical Priority Dispatch System Protocol to predict the acuity of "Unknown Problem" dispatch response levels [J].
Clawson, Jeff ;
Olola, Christopher ;
Heward, Andy ;
Patterson, Brett ;
Scott, Greg .
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2008, 12 (03) :290-296
[6]   Cardiac arrest predictability in seizure patients based on emergency medical dispatcher identification of previous seizure or epilepsy history [J].
Clawson, Jeff ;
Olola, Christopher ;
Heward, Andy ;
Patterson, Brett .
RESUSCITATION, 2007, 75 (02) :298-304
[7]   Accuracy of emergency medical dispatchers' subjective ability to identify when higher dispatch levels are warranted over a Medical Priority Dispatch System automated protocol's recommended coding based on paramedic outcome data [J].
Clawson, Jeff ;
Olola, Christopher H. O. ;
Heward, Andy ;
Scott, Greg ;
Patterson, Brett .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (08) :560-563
[8]   Comparison of the medical priority dispatch system to an out-of-hospital patient acuity score [J].
Feldman, Michael J. ;
Verbeek, P. Richard ;
Lyons, David G. ;
Chad, Sandra J. ;
Craig, Alan M. ;
Schwartz, Brian .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (09) :954-960
[9]   Sensitivity and Specificity of the Medical Priority Dispatch System in Detecting Cardiac Arrest Emergency Calls in Melbourne [J].
Flynn, Julie ;
Archer, Frank ;
Morgans, Amee .
PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (02) :72-76
[10]   Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation [J].
Hallstrom, A ;
Cobb, L ;
Johnson, E ;
Copass, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (21) :1546-1553