Urban stormwater drainage management: The development of a multicriteria decision aid approach for best management practices

被引:111
作者
Martin, C.
Ruperd, Y.
Legret, M.
机构
[1] Lab Cent Ponts & Chaussees, Div Eau & Environm, F-44341 Bouguenais, France
[2] Ctr Etud Tech & Equipement, Lab Reg Ponts & Chaussees, F-33019 Bordeaux, France
关键词
multicriteria analysis; ELECTRE; OR in stormwater management; source control;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.019
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Multicriteria analysis methods have been used over the past decade for resolving environmental issues. This paper deals with the application of a multicriteria analysis (MCA) approach to urban stormwater drainage management. Stormwater source control has become a popular alternative solution for managing stormwater in urban areas. Source control constitutes one variant of best management practices (BMPs) that can be evaluated with respect to various criteria, including: hydraulic efficiency, pollution retention, environmental impact, operation and maintenance, economic investment, and social and sustainable urban living. A French survey was undertaken to assess the performance of different BMPs at the national scale; results highlight the main reasons justifying the use of BMPs. These reasons are primarily related to flood prevention, which far outweighs the economic incentives. Moreover, hydraulic and technical aspects are most frequently noted by users, whereas operation and maintenance aspects are often seen as obstacles to application of these techniques. The survey results, completed by a literature review and expert statements, have been used to establish a matrix of alternatives for multicriteria analysis. The MCA results obtained allow ranking the various alternatives from best to worst, taking into account the different strategies adopted by the decision-makers involved. The development of a multicriteria approach could, in the future, serve as a supporting decision-aid tool, whose purpose would be to guide users in their choice of stormwater source solution. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 349
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Anderson BC, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V45, P277
  • [2] AZZOUT Y, 1996, THESIS INSA LYON
  • [3] AZZOUT Y, 1994, THESIS PARIS
  • [4] Selection aid of alternative techniques in urban storm drainage - Proposition of an expert system
    Barraud, S
    Azzout, Y
    Cres, FN
    Chocat, B
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (04) : 241 - 248
  • [5] Barraud S, 2004, URBAN WATER J, V1, P209, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15730620410001732035, 10.1080/15730620410001732035]
  • [6] A multicriterion analysis of the water allocation conflict in the Upper Rio Grande basin
    Bella, A
    Duckstein, L
    Szidarovszky, F
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 1996, 77 (2-3) : 245 - 265
  • [7] CASTRO LMA, 2004, NOV 2004 LYON, V2, P1333
  • [8] Developing, evaluating and maintaining a standardized stormwater BMP effectiveness database
    Clary, J
    Urbonas, B
    Jones, J
    Strecker, E
    Quigley, M
    O'Brien, J
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (07) : 65 - 73
  • [9] Multicriteria decision approaches to support sustainable drainage options for the treatment of highway and urban runoff
    Ellis, JB
    Deutsch, JC
    Mouchel, JM
    Scholes, L
    Revitt, MD
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 334 : 251 - 260
  • [10] *EPA, 1999, 4303 EPA OFF WAT