Cytotoxicity evaluation of various resin based root canal sealers

被引:54
作者
Al-Hiyasat, A. S. [1 ]
Tayyar, M. [2 ]
Darmani, H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Conservat Dent, Fac Dent, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Biotechnol & Genet Engn, Fac Sci, Irbid 22110, Jordan
关键词
cytotoxicity; endodontic sealer; fibroblasts; mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity; IN-VITRO CYTOTOXICITY; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL; ENDODONTIC SEALERS; FLUID TRANSPORT; AH PLUS; MICROLEAKAGE; GENOTOXICITY; FIBROBLASTS; TISSUE; CELLS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01669.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Aim To investigate the cytotoxic effects of four resin-based root canal sealers, namely, AHPlus, an epoxy resin; EndoREZ, a single-methacrylate-based sealer; Epiphany, a multi-methacrylate resin-based sealer; and Metaseal, one of the latest generation methacrylate 4-MET A-containing resin-based sealers. Methodology The materials were mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions, and elutes of the materials were prepared by incubating 1 g of the endodontic sealers in sterile phosphate-buffered saline for 1 week at 37 degrees C. The elutes were incubated with Balb C 3T3 fibroblasts for 48 h, and cytotoxic activity was measured using the MTT assay ([3-4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide succinate), which tests for mitochondrial enzyme activity. Results All materials were cytotoxic to different degrees. AHPlus was the least cytotoxic followed by EndoRez, Epiphany and Metaseal, which was the most cytotoxic. Statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed highly significant differences between the effects of the elutes of different materials on cell viability (P < 0.001). Follow-up comparison by Tukey test showed that all the materials were significantly different from each other (P < 0.05). Conclusion AHPlus was the most biocompatible material tested because it showed low cytotoxicity, followed by EndoRez, which was moderately cytotoxic; Epiphany, which was highly cytotoxic; and Metaseal, which was severely cytotoxic. Dilution of the elutes of the materials by tenfold markedly reduced the cytotoxic effect of AHPlus, EndoRez and Epiphany but did not affect that of the elute of Metaseal, which remained severly cytotoxic even after dilution.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 153
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Contemporary Methacrylate Resin-based Root Canal Sealers Exhibit Different Degrees of Ex Vivo Cytotoxicity When Cured in Their Self-cured Mode [J].
Ames, Jason M. ;
Loushine, Robert J. ;
Babb, Brian R. ;
Bryan, Thomas. E. ;
Lockwood, Petra. E. ;
Sui, Mai ;
Roberts, Steven ;
Weller, R. Norman ;
Pashley, David H. ;
Tay, Franklin R. .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2009, 35 (02) :225-228
[2]
Tissue reaction initiated by different sealers [J].
Bernáth, M ;
Szabó, J .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2003, 36 (04) :256-261
[3]
Bertram John S., 2000, Molecular Aspects of Medicine, V21, P167, DOI 10.1016/S0098-2997(00)00007-8
[4]
In vitro cytotoxicity and dentin permeability of HEMA [J].
Bouillaguet, S ;
Wataha, JC ;
Hanks, CT ;
Ciucchi, B ;
Holz, J .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1996, 22 (05) :244-248
[5]
Cytotoxicity and sealing properties of four classes of endodontic sealers evaluated by succinic dehydrogenase activity and confocal laser scanning microscopy [J].
Bouillaguet, S ;
Wataha, JC ;
Lockwood, PE ;
Galgano, C ;
Golay, A ;
Krejci, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2004, 112 (02) :182-187
[6]
Cytotoxicity testing of endodontic sealers: A new method [J].
Camps, J ;
About, I .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2003, 29 (09) :583-586
[7]
THE APICAL SEAL OF ROOT-CANAL SEALING CEMENTS USING A RADIONUCLIDE DETECTION TECHNIQUE [J].
CANALDASAHLI, C ;
BRAUAGUADE, E ;
SENTISVILALTA, J ;
AGUADEBRUIX, S .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1992, 25 (05) :250-256
[8]
Stimulation of glutathione depletion, ROS production and cell cycle arrest of dental pulp cells and gingival epithelial cells by HEMA [J].
Chang, HH ;
Guo, MK ;
Kasten, FH ;
Chang, MC ;
Huang, GF ;
Wang, YL ;
Wang, RS ;
Jeng, JH .
BIOMATERIALS, 2005, 26 (07) :745-753
[9]
Cohen B I, 1998, Oral Health, V88, P37
[10]
De Deus Q D, 1975, J Endod, V1, P361