Temporal variability in rill erodibility for two types of grasslands

被引:20
作者
Zhang, Guang-hui [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Ke-ming [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Zhen-ling [2 ]
Zhang, X. C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Engn Technol, Yaan 625014, Sichuang, Peoples R China
[4] ARS, USDA, Grazinglands Res Lab, El Reno, OK 73036 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
concentrated flow; grassland; rill erodibility; soil erosion resistance; temporal variation; CONCENTRATED FLOW EROSION; DIFFERENT LAND USES; LOESS PLATEAU; SOIL DETACHMENT; WATER EROSION; VEGETATION RESTORATION; OVERLAND-FLOW; ROOT BIOMASS; PLANT-ROOTS; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1071/SR14076
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The temporal variability in rill erodibility (K-r) and its influencing factors are not fully quantified in grasslands. This study was conducted to detect temporal variation and quantify the potential factors causing changes in rill erodibility by using natural, undisturbed soil samples collected from two grasslands and one bare soil near Beijing, China. Sampling was at similar to 20-day intervals from April to October 2011. Soil detachment capacity by concentrated flow was measured in a hydraulic flume with the fixed bed under six different flow shear stresses to determine rill erodibility. Root mass density was measured to analyse potential effects on temporal variability in rill erodibility. Mean rill erodibility of bare soil was 13.2 and 19.6 times greater than under switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis). The temporal variability in rill erodibility under grasslands differed significantly from that of bare soil. Distinctive temporal variation patterns were found throughout the growing season. Rill erodibility declined as root density increased, and the rill erodibility of grassland could be well estimated from the measured erodibility of bare soil and root density (R-2 >= 0.92). The results of this study aid understanding of soil erosion mechanisms and development of process-based erosion models to simulate the seasonal variation in soil detachment by concentrated flow for grassland.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 788
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, KEYS SOIL TAX
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U PRETORIA PR
[3]  
Bennett SJ, 2000, T ASAE, V43, P641, DOI 10.13031/2013.2745
[4]   Root biomass and shoot to root ratios of perennial forage crops in eastern Canada [J].
Bolinder, MA ;
Angers, DA ;
Bélanger, G ;
Michaud, R ;
Laverdière, MR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (04) :731-737
[5]   Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope [J].
Bryan, RB .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2000, 32 (3-4) :385-415
[6]   Plant root traits affecting the resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion [J].
Burylo, Melanie ;
Rey, Freddy ;
Mathys, Nicolle ;
Dutoit, Thierry .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2012, 37 (14) :1463-1470
[7]   Impact of root architecture on the erosion-reducing potential of roots during concentrated flow [J].
De Baets, S. ;
Poesen, J. ;
Knapen, A. ;
Galindo, P. .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2007, 32 (09) :1323-1345
[8]   Effects of grass roots on the erodibility of topsoils during concentrated flow [J].
De Baets, S. ;
Poesen, J. ;
Gyssels, G. ;
Knapen, A. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2006, 76 (1-2) :54-67
[9]   Empirical models for predicting the erosion-reducing effects of plant roots during concentrated flow erosion [J].
De Baets, S. ;
Poesen, J. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2010, 118 (3-4) :425-432
[10]  
Flanagan DC, 2007, T ASABE, V50, P1603, DOI 10.13031/2013.23968