What do microarrays really tell us about M-tuberculosis?
被引:61
作者:
Kendall, SL
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, EnglandUniv London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, England
Kendall, SL
[1
]
Rison, SCG
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, EnglandUniv London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, England
Rison, SCG
[1
]
Movahedzadeh, F
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, EnglandUniv London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, England
Movahedzadeh, F
[1
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Frita, R
[1
]
Stoker, NG
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, EnglandUniv London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, England
Stoker, NG
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ London Royal Vet Coll, Dept Pathol & Infect Dis, London NW1 0TU, England
Bacterial pathogens adapt to their host environments to a large extent through switching on complex transcriptional programmes, and whole-genome microarray experiments promise to reveal this complexity. There has been a recent burst of articles reporting transcriptome analyses of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, including for the first time studies in macrophages and mice. We review gene expression reports, and compare them with each other and with microarray-based gene essentiality studies, revealing at times a startling lack of correlation. Additionally, we suggest a standardization format for the submission of processed data for publication, to facilitate cross-experiment analyses.