Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics

被引:52
作者
Levitt, Jonathan M. [1 ,2 ]
Thelwall, Mike [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Dept Informat Sci, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] Wolverhampton Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Technol, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Citation analysis; Research collaboration; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; SELF-CITATIONS; CO-AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH; RELATIVE INDICATORS; IMPACT; ARTICLES; SCIENCE; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-010-0197-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Many studies have found that collaborative research is, in general, more highly cited than non-collaborative research. This paper describes an investigation into the extent to which the association between high citation and collaboration for Economics articles published in 2000 varies from region to region and depends on the choice of indicator of citation level. Using data from the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) for 18 countries, 17 American states and four indicators of citation level the citation levels of the collaborative articles are compared with the citation levels of the non-collaborative articles. The main findings are that: (a) for every country and every indicator the mean citation level of the collaborative articles was at least as high as that for the non-collaborative articles, but for five US states and for at least one other indicator the citation level of collaborative articles was lower than that of non-collaborative articles, and (b) the extent to which collaborative articles were more highly cited varied considerably from country to country, from state to state, and from indicator to indicator. This indicates the importance of using multiple indicators when investigating citation advantage since the choice of indicator can change the results.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 183
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CITATION ANAL RES EV
[2]   Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research [J].
Avkiran, NK .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1997, 39 (02) :173-184
[3]   Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research [J].
Bordons, M ;
Gomez, I ;
Fernandez, MT ;
Zulueta, MA ;
Mendez, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 37 (02) :279-295
[4]  
Crase D., 1992, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, V63, P28
[5]  
Frederiksen LF, 2004, SCIENTOMETRICS, V61, P253
[6]  
Glänzel W, 2000, SCIENTOMETRICS, V48, P121, DOI 10.1023/A:1005640604267
[7]   Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? [J].
Glänzel, W ;
Thijs, B .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2004, 61 (03) :395-404
[8]   A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication [J].
Glänzel W. ;
Thijs B. ;
Schlemmer B. .
Scientometrics, 2004, 59 (1) :63-77
[9]  
Glänzel W, 2002, LIBR TRENDS, V50, P461
[10]   National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations [J].
Glänzel, W .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (01) :69-115