Risk and mechanism of dexamethasone-induced deterioration of glucose tolerance in non-diabetic first-degree relatives of NIDDM patients

被引:6
作者
Henriksen, JE [1 ]
Alford, F [1 ]
Ward, GM [1 ]
BeckNielsen, H [1 ]
机构
[1] ST VINCENT HOSP, DEPT ENDOCRINOL & DIABET, MELBOURNE, VIC, AUSTRALIA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
minimal model analysis; insulin secretion; insulin resistance; relatives of NIDDM patients; steroids; glucose intolerance;
D O I
10.1007/s001250050847
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We tested the hypothesis that glucose intolerance develops in genetically prone subjects when exogenous insulin resistance is induced by dexamethasone (dex) and investigated whether the steroid-induced glucose intolerance is due to impairment of beta-cell function alone and/or insulin resistance. Oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) and intravenous glucose tolerance tests with minimal model analysis were performed before and following 5 days of dex treatment (4 mg/day) in 20 relatives of non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients and in 20 matched control subjects (age: 29.6 +/- 1.7 vs 29.6 +/- 1.6 years, BMI: 25.1 +/- 1.0 vs 25.1 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)). Before dex, glucose tolerance was similar in both groups (2-h plasma glucose concentration (PG): 5.5 +/- 0.2 [range: 3.2-7.0] vs 5.5 +/- 0.2 [3.7-7.4] mmol/ 1). Although insulin sensitivity (Si) was significantly lower in the relatives before dex, insulin sensitivity was reduced to a similar level during dex in both the relatives and control subjects (0.30 +/- 0.04 vs 0.34 +/- 0.04 10(-4) min(-1) per pmol/l, NS). During dex, the variation in the OGTT 2-h PG was greater in the relatives (8.5 +/- 0.7 [3.9-17.0] vs 7.5 +/- 0.3 [5.7-9.8] mmol/l, F-test p < 0.05) which, by inspection of the data, was caused by seven relatives with a higher PG than the maximal value seen in the control subjects (9.8 mmol/l). These ''hyperglycaemic'' relatives had diminished first phase insulin secretion (empty setl) both before and during dex compared with the ''normal'' relatives and the control subjects (pre-dex empty set1: 12.6 +/- 3.6 vs 26.4 +/- 4.2 and 24.6 +/- 3.6 (p < 0.05), post-dex empty set1: 22.2 +/- 6.6vs 48.0 +/- 7.2 and 46.2 +/- 6.6 respectively (p < 0.05) pmol.l(-1).min(-1) per mg/dl). However, Si was similar in ''hyperglycaemic'' and ''normal'' relatives before dex (0.65 +/- 0.10 vs 0.54 +/- 0.10 10(-4).min(-1) per pmol/l) and suppressed similarly during dex (0.30 +/- 0.07 vs 0.30 +/- 0.06 10(-4) min(-1) per pmol/l). Multiple regression analysis confirmed the unique importance of low pre-dex beta-cell function to subsequent development of high 2-h post-dex OGTT plasma glucose levels (R-2 = 0.56). In conclusion, exogenous induced insulin resistance by dex will induce impaired or diabetic glucose tolerance in those genetic relatives of NIDDM patients who have impaired beta-cell function (retrospectively) prior to dex exposure. These subjects are therefore unable to enhance their beta-cell response in order to match the dex-induced insulin resistant state.
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1448
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   INVIVO REGULATION OF NON-INSULIN-MEDIATED AND INSULIN-MEDIATED GLUCOSE-UPTAKE BY CORTISOL [J].
BARON, AD ;
WALLACE, P ;
BRECHTEL, G .
DIABETES, 1987, 36 (11) :1230-1237
[2]   INSULIN RESISTANCE IN SKELETAL-MUSCLES IN PATIENTS WITH NIDDM [J].
BECKNIELSEN, H ;
VAAG, A ;
DAMSBO, P ;
HANDBERG, A ;
NIELSEN, OH ;
HENRIKSEN, JE ;
THYERONN, P .
DIABETES CARE, 1992, 15 (03) :418-429
[3]   QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY [J].
BERGMAN, RN ;
IDER, YZ ;
BOWDEN, CR ;
COBELLI, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 236 (06) :E667-E677
[4]   TOWARD PHYSIOLOGICAL UNDERSTANDING OF GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE - MINIMAL-MODEL APPROACH [J].
BERGMAN, RN .
DIABETES, 1989, 38 (12) :1512-1527
[5]   FORMULATION AND TESTING OF MODELS [J].
BERMAN, M .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1963, 108 (01) :182-&
[6]  
BOSTON R, 1984, MATH BIOSCI, V72, P191
[7]   CONVERSATIONAL SAAM - AN INTERACTIVE PROGRAM FOR KINETIC-ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS [J].
BOSTON, RC ;
GREIF, PC ;
BERMAN, M .
COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1981, 13 (1-2) :111-119
[8]   INSULINOPENIA AND HYPERGLYCEMIA INFLUENCE THE IN-VIVO PARTITIONING OF GE AND SI [J].
CHRISTOPHER, MJ ;
RANTZAU, C ;
WARD, GM ;
ALFORD, FP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 1995, 268 (03) :E410-E421
[9]   EFFECT OF HYPERCORTICISM ON REGULATION OF SKELETAL-MUSCLE GLYCOGEN-METABOLISM BY EPINEPHRINE [J].
CODERRE, L ;
SRIVASTAVA, AK ;
CHIASSON, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 262 (04) :E434-E439
[10]   PREDIABETIC STATE - A CONCEPT OF DYNAMIC RESISTANCE TO A GENETIC DIABETOGENIC INFLUENCE [J].
CONN, JW ;
FAJANS, SS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1961, 31 (06) :839-&