Update on impact of moderate dose of adjuvant radiation on urinary continence and sexual potency in prostate cancer patients treated with nerve-sparing prostatectomy

被引:36
作者
Formenti, SC
Lieskovsky, G
Skinner, D
Tsao-Wei, DD
Groshen, S
Petrovich, Z
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00677-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Adjuvant radiotherapy to the prostatic bed at moderate doses of 45 to 54 Gy achieves results comparable to higher doses. We studied the effect of moderate doses of postoperative radiation therapy on urinary continence and sexual potency in prostate cancer patients who had undergone nerve-sparing prostatectomy. Methods. Between November 1983 and December 1992, 255 prostate cancer patients were selected to undergo nerve-sparing prostatectomy. A total of 94 (37%) patients had received adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy, 45 to 54 Gy to the prostatic bed, based on microscopic positive margins, seminal vesicle involvement, and/or Gleason score. Subjective patient reports regarding the potency and urinary continence status were recorded during a semistructured telephone interview at 3 or more years after treatment. The findings in irradiated and nonirradiated patients were compared and correlated to those obtained from the same patients preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Results. At 3 or more years of follow-up no significant difference among irradiated and nonirradiated patients was detected. Most patients described optimal urinary continence and approximately one third had maintained potency after bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy. None of the patients who had undergone unilateral nerve-sparing surgery remained potent. Using a multivariable analysis, the significant predictors for maintaining potency were the status at 1 year postoperatively and bilateral versus unilateral nerve-sparing procedure. Conclusions. Doses of adjuvant radiation therapy in the range used (45 to 54 Gy) did not affect the long-term pattern of maintenance of either function. UROLOGY 56: 453-458, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 458
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY FOR PATHOLOGICAL STAGE T3/4 ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE - 10-YEAR UPDATE [J].
ANSCHER, MS ;
ROBERTSON, CN ;
PROSNITZ, LR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (01) :37-43
[2]  
BENDLER CB, 1992, CA CANC J CLIN, V4, P212
[3]   Evaluation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels after postoperative radiation therapy for pathologic stage T3, NO prostate cancer [J].
Buskirk, SJ ;
Schild, SE ;
Durr, ED ;
Robinow, JS ;
Bock, FF ;
Wolfe, JT ;
Tomera, KM ;
Ferrigni, RG .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 71 (03) :242-248
[4]   NERVE-SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - EVALUATION OF RESULTS AFTER 250 PATIENTS [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
BIGG, SW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (03) :538-544
[5]  
DUNJIC A, 1974, Current Topics in Radiation Research Quarterly, V10, P170
[6]  
FLEISS JL, 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, P168
[7]  
FLETCHER GH, 1973, BRIT J RADIOL, V46, P1
[8]   Therapeutic irradiation for patients with an elevated post-prostatectomy prostate specific antigen level [J].
Forman, JD ;
Meetze, K ;
Pontes, E ;
Wood, DP ;
Shamsa, F ;
Rana, T ;
Porter, AT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (04) :1436-1439
[9]   Impact of moderate dose of postoperative radiation on urinary continence and potency in patients with prostate cancer treated with nerve sparing prostatectomy [J].
Formenti, SC ;
Lieskovsky, G ;
Simoneau, AR ;
Skinner, D ;
Groshen, S ;
Chen, SC ;
Petrovich, Z .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (02) :616-619
[10]   RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY AND POSTOPERATIVE ADJUVANT RADIATION FOR PATHOLOGICAL STAGE-C (PCN0) PROSTATE-CANCER FROM 1976 TO 1989 - INTERMEDIATE FINDINGS [J].
FREEMAN, JA ;
LIESKOVSKY, G ;
COOK, DW ;
PETROVICH, Z ;
CHEN, SC ;
GROSHEN, S ;
SKINNER, DG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (05) :1029-1034