Prospective analysis of adverse events in surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis

被引:19
作者
Kelly, Adrienne M. [1 ]
Batke, Juliet N. N. [2 ]
Dea, Nicolas [2 ,3 ]
Hartig, Dennis P. P. [4 ]
Fisher, Charles G. [2 ,3 ]
Street, John T. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Otsego Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Gaylord, MI 49735 USA
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Orthopaed, Div Spine, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Combined Neurosurg & Orthopaed Spine Program, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] Royal Brisbane Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
关键词
Adverse events; Degenerative spondylolisthesis; Prospective; Surgical treatment; Outcome assessment; Lumbar; SPINE SURGERY; PATIENT SAFETY; LUMBAR SPINE; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical adverse event (AE) monitoring is imprecise, of uncertain validity, and tends toward underreporting. Reports focus on specific procedures rather than outcomes in the context of presenting diagnosis. Specific intraoperative (intraop) or postoperative (postop) AEs that may be independently associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) have never been reported. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to assess the AE profile of surgically treated patients with L4-L5 DS. The secondary goal was to identify potential risk factors that correlate with those AEs. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective cohort and academic quaternary spine center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety-two patients with L4-L5 DS were treated surgically, discharged from Vancouver General Hospital between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rates and odds ratios. METHODS: Prospective AE data were analyzed using univariate analyses, forward selection regression models, and Spearman correlation coefficients. Results were compared with outcomes reported in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. RESULTS: No AEs were seen in 57.6% of patients, one AE in 17.4%, and two or more AEs in 17.4%. Dural tears (6.5%) and intraop bone-implant interface failure requiring revision (3.3%) were the most common intraop AEs. Postoperatively, the most frequent AEs were urinary tract infection (10.9%), delirium (5.4%), neuropathic pain (4.4%), deep wound infection (3.3%), and superficial wound infection (3.3%). The odds of an intraop AE increased by 9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1-18) per year of age at admission. Adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) did not correlate with number of AEs experienced. The odds of postop delirium correlated with CCI (odds ratio [OR] 3.39, 95% CI 1.12-10.24) and dural tear (OR 35.84, 95% CI 1.72-747.45). Length of stay was statistically significant and was influenced by two or more AEs, CCI, postop loss of correction, cerebrospinal fluid leak, deep wound infection, noninfected wound drainage, and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of intraop AEs, but not postop AEs, increased with increasing age. Having multiple comorbidities does not predispose to more AEs. Infections predominate among the postop AEs. Patients at increased risk of delirium or of having an increased length of hospital stay may more easily be predicted. Studies specifically designed to prospectively assess AEs have the potential to more accurately identify postop AE rates. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2905 / 2910
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Mitigating Adverse Event Reporting Bias in Spine Surgery
    Auerbach, Joshua D.
    McGowan, Kevin B.
    Halevi, Marci
    Gerling, Michael C.
    Sharan, Alok D.
    Whang, Peter G.
    Maislin, Greg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (16) : 1450 - 1456
  • [2] Bruce J, 2001, Health Technol Assess, V5, P1
  • [3] VALIDATION OF A COMBINED COMORBIDITY INDEX
    CHARLSON, M
    SZATROWSKI, TP
    PETERSON, J
    GOLD, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (11) : 1245 - 1251
  • [4] Surgeon Perceptions and Reported Complications in Spine Surgery
    Dekutoski, Mark B.
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Chapman, Jens R.
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) : S9 - S21
  • [5] Methods for the Systematic Reviews on Patient Safety During Spine Surgery
    Dettori, Joseph R.
    Norvell, Daniel C.
    Dekutoski, Mark
    Fisher, Charles
    Chapman, Jens R.
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (09) : S22 - S27
  • [6] MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN ASSOCIATION WITH OPERATIONS ON THE LUMBAR SPINE - THE INFLUENCE OF AGE, DIAGNOSIS, AND PROCEDURE
    DEYO, RA
    CHERKIN, DC
    LOESER, JD
    BIGOS, SJ
    CIOL, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (04) : 536 - 543
  • [7] Complications in spine surgery A review
    Nasser, Rani
    Yadla, Sanjay
    Maltenfort, Mitchell G.
    Harrop, James S.
    Anderson, D. Greg
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Sharan, Ashwini D.
    Ratliff, John K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (02) : 144 - 157
  • [8] Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: Implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols
    Rampersaud, Y. Raja
    Moro, Eduardo R. P.
    Neary, Mary Ann
    White, Kevin
    Lewis, Stephen J.
    Massicotte, Eric M.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (13) : 1503 - 1510
  • [9] Spine Adverse Events Severity System Content Validation and Interobserver Reliability Assessment
    Rampersaud, Yoga Raja
    Neary, Mary Ann
    White, Kevin
    [J]. SPINE, 2010, 35 (07) : 790 - 795
  • [10] Rigby K, 1999, J Qual Clin Pract, V19, P7, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00301.x