Proximate mechanisms of age polyethism in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L.

被引:33
作者
Calderone, NW [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Entomol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
Apis mellifera; social behavior; age polyethism; self-organization; division of labor; emergent property; social insects;
D O I
10.1051/apido:19980108
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Workers in most insect societies exhibit a division of labor known as age polyethism, so named because workers tend to perform different tasks at different times in their lives. The most common explanation for this phenomenon involves a weak causal link between a worker's age and its occupation. However, available estimates of age effects are generally confounded with other sources of variability. Further, there is considerable variation in the age at which each task is performed. Consequently, the role of age in division of labor remains unresolved. An alternative model, christened 'foraging-for-work', explains age polyethism without a causal link between age and occupation. The specific algorithm, however, is too restrictive to apply in many task situations, and it is inconsistent with existing data on how workers actually locate and select tasks in certain contexts. Therefore, it cannot serve as a general model for task location/selection or for age polyethism. The model's conceptual basis, however, that an age-neutral mechanism can generate age polyethism, is an important contribution that demands further study. The current dialogue over proximate mechanisms of age polyethism has helped to clarify the pattern of behavioral ontogeny in honey bees. A conservative interpretation of existing data is that behavioral ontogeny is characterized by a nest phase followed by a foraging phase. The timing of the transition between these phases is determined more by the environment and physiological processes than by age. Whether nest tasks also follow a necessary sequence is less certain and requires further study. (C) Inra/DIB/AGIB/Elsevier, Paris.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 158
页数:32
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]  
BESHERS SN, 1994, ECOLOGY, V75, P763, DOI 10.2307/1941733
[2]   Self-organization in social insects [J].
Bonabeau, E ;
Theraulaz, G ;
Deneubourg, JL ;
Aron, S ;
Camazine, S .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1997, 12 (05) :188-193
[3]  
BOURKE A.F.G., 1995, Social evolution in ants
[4]   DIVISION-OF-LABOR DURING HONEY-BEE COLONY DEFENSE [J].
BREED, MD ;
ROBINSON, GE ;
PAGE, RE .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1990, 27 (06) :395-401
[5]  
BURRELL BD, 1994, J COMP PHYSIOL A, V174, P581, DOI 10.1007/BF00217379
[6]  
CALABI P, 1988, ADV MYRMECOLOGY
[7]   GENOTYPIC VARIABILITY IN AGE POLYETHISM AND TASK SPECIALIZATION IN THE HONEY BEE, APIS-MELLIFERA (HYMENOPTERA, APIDAE) [J].
CALDERONE, NW ;
PAGE, RE .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1988, 22 (01) :17-25
[8]   EFFECTS OF INTERACTIONS AMONG GENOTYPICALLY DIVERSE NESTMATES ON TASK SPECIALIZATION BY FORAGING HONEY-BEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) [J].
CALDERONE, NW ;
PAGE, RE .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (3-4) :219-226
[9]   EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF DIVISION-OF-LABOR IN COLONIES OF THE HONEY-BEE (APIS-MELLIFERA) [J].
CALDERONE, NW ;
PAGE, RE .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1991, 138 (01) :69-92