BLUP, a new paradigm in host-range determination

被引:9
作者
Berner, D. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] ARS, Foreign Dis Weed Sci Res Unit, USDA, Frederick, MD 21702 USA
关键词
BLUP; Biological control agents; Classical biological control; Disease prediction; Henderson's mixed model equations; Host-range testing; Insects; invasive weeds; MME; Non-target damage prediction; Plant pathogens; LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL AGENT; BREEDING VALUES; RUSSIAN THISTLE; SPECIFICITY; RELATIVES; SALSOLAE; RECORDS; PLANTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.01.011
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The centrifugal phylogenetic method has been the basis of selection of non-target plants to test for specificity of biological control agents for the last 35 years. In the last decade there has been increased attention paid to modernizing the approach and basing selection of test plants on molecular phylogeny rather than taxonomic classification. Recently mixed model equations (MME) and best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) were used to determine the probable host-range of two plant pathogens proposed for classical biological control of Russian thistle. BLUPs were derived with the MME by incorporating disease ratings, variances, and relationship matrices computed from genetic (DNA) distances among plant species related to Russian thistle. Although this work focused on evaluating disease severity on related plant species, the MME can be used with any biological weed control agent or target as long as the evaluation criterion is quantitative (or appropriately transformed) and variances and molecular genetic relationships among test species can be obtained. Moreover, since BLUPs can be generated for species with no observed data, the MME are ideally suited to both evaluation of test plant species and construction of test plant lists based on molecular phylogenetic relationships and reactions of the species to the biological control agent. Many biological control practitioners may be unfamiliar with this methodology. The objectives of this manuscript are to familiarize biological control researchers and regulators with some of the requirements and advantages of the MME and the use of the MME to construct test plant lists. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 152
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BANDOLIER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PLANTS DAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.6
[4]   Estimation of breeding values of inbred lines using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and genetic similarities [J].
Bauer, Andrea M. ;
Reetz, Tobias C. ;
Leon, Jens .
CROP SCIENCE, 2006, 46 (06) :2685-2691
[5]   Best linear unbiased prediction of host-range of the facultative parasite Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp salsolae, a potential biological control agent of Russian thistle [J].
Berner, D. K. ;
Bruckart, W. L. ;
Cavin, C. A. ;
Michael, J. L. ;
Carter, M. L. ;
Luster, D. G. .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2009, 51 (01) :158-168
[6]   Mixed model analysis combining disease ratings and DNA sequences to determine host range of Uromyces salsolae for biological control of Russian thistle [J].
Berner, D. K. ;
Bruckart, W. L. ;
Cavin, C. A. ;
Michael, J. L. .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2009, 49 (01) :68-76
[7]   ISSR fingerprinting for the assessment of the bindweed biocontrol agent Stagonospora convolvuli LA39 after field release [J].
Boss, Desiree ;
Maurhofer, Monika ;
Zala, Marcello ;
Defago, Genevieve ;
Brunner, Patrick C. .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (03) :244-251
[8]   Choosing the right plants to test:: The host-specificity of Longitarsus sp (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) a potential biological control agent of Heliotropium amplexicaule [J].
Briese, D. T. ;
Walker, A. .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2008, 44 (03) :271-285
[9]   Translating host-specificity test results into the real world: The need to harmonize the yin and yang of current testing procedures [J].
Briese, DT .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2005, 35 (03) :208-214
[10]  
BRIESE DT, 2003, CRC TECHNICAL SERIES, V7, P23