Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair

被引:80
作者
Eklund, A. [1 ]
Rudberg, C.
Leijonmarck, C. -E.
Rasmussen, I.
Spangen, L.
Wickbom, G.
Wingren, U.
Montgomery, A.
机构
[1] Vasteras Hosp, Dept Surg, S-72189 Vasteras, Sweden
[2] St Gorans Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-11251 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Surg, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Cent Hosp Karlstad, Dept Surg, S-65230 Karlstad, Sweden
[5] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[6] Molndal Cty Hosp, Dept Surg, S-43130 Molndal, Sweden
[7] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-21428 Malmo, Sweden
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2007年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
inguinal hernia; laparoscopy; Lichtenstein; pain; recurrence;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-006-9163-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment for recurrent inguinal hernia is of concern due to the high frequency of recurrence. Methods: This randomized multicenter study compared the short- and long-term results for recurrent inguinal hernia repair by either the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch (TAPP) procedure or the Lichtenstein technique. Results: A total of 147 patients underwent surgery (73 TAPP and 74 Lichtenstein). The operating time was 65 min (range, 23-165 min) for the TAPP group and 64 min (range, 25-135 min) for the Lichtenstein group. Patients who underwent TAPP reported significantly less postoperative pain and shorter sick leave (8 vs 16 days). The recurrence rate 5 years after surgery was 19% for the TAPP group and 18% for the Lichtenstein group. Conclusion: The short-term advantage for patients who undergo the laparoscopic technique is less postoperative pain and shorter sick leave. In the long term, no differences were observed in the chronic pain or recurrence rate.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 640
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy [J].
Aasvang, E ;
Kehlet, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (01) :69-76
[2]  
ABRAHAMSON J, 1994, PROSTHESES ABDOMINAL, P138
[3]  
ARREGUI ME, 1993, SURG CLIN N AM, V73, P513
[4]   Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia [J].
Arvidsson, D ;
Berndsen, FH ;
Larsson, LG ;
Leijonmarck, CE ;
Rimbäck, G ;
Rudberg, C ;
Smedberg, S ;
Spangen, L ;
Montgomery, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (09) :1085-1091
[5]   Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: A nationwide questionnaire study [J].
Bay-Nielsen, M ;
Perkins, FM ;
Kehlet, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (01) :1-7
[6]   Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial [J].
Beets, GL ;
Dirksen, CD ;
Go, PMNYH ;
Geisler, FEA ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
Kootstra, G .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (04) :323-327
[7]  
Bendavid R, 1994, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P387
[8]  
Berndsen F, 2002, Hernia, V6, P56
[9]   Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia [J].
Bittner, R ;
Schmedt, CG ;
Schwarz, J ;
Kraft, K ;
Leibl, BJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (08) :1062-1066
[10]   Randomised study of Lichtenstein compared with Shouldice inguinal hernia repair by surgeons in training [J].
Danielsson, P ;
Isacson, S ;
Hansen, MV .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 165 (01) :49-53