T1p MR imaging characteristics of human anterior tibial and gastrocnemius muscles

被引:16
作者
Virta, A [1 ]
Komu, M [1 ]
Lundbom, N [1 ]
Kormano, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Turku, Finland
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); comparative studies; tissue characterization; muscle; MR;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80130-X
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors evaluated the value of T1 rho in relation to T1 and T2 in the characterization of human muscles. Materials and Methods. The authors studied the effect of muscle type (anterior tibial [AT] and gastrocnemius [GC]), sex, and age on 1/T1 and 1/T2 at 0.1 T and 1/T1 rho at locking-field B(1)s (spin-locking radio-frequency magnetic induction field) of 10-160 mu T in 38 healthy volunteers. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and fat was evaluated with different T1-, T2-, and T1 rho-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequences. Results. The 1/T1, 1/T2, and 1/T1 rho were slightly higher in AT than in GC muscles. The 1/T2 and 1/T1 rho of AT muscles showed a sex dependence, whereas no correlation with age was found. The CNR of the T1 rho-weighted images did not markedly differ from that of the T1- and T2-weighted images. Conclusion. T1 rho is as sensitive as T2 to the composition of muscle, whereas T1 is less sensitive. In MR imaging of normal muscle, T1 rho and T2 provide a relatively similar tissue contrast.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 110
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   PULSED NMR STUDIES OF WATER IN STRIATED-MUSCLE .1. TRANSVERSE NUCLEAR SPIN RELAXATION-TIMES AND FREEZING EFFECTS [J].
BELTON, PS ;
JACKSON, RR ;
PACKER, KJ .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1972, 286 (01) :16-&
[2]  
BLOOM W, 1994, TXB HISTOLOGY, P266
[3]   1/T1-RHO AND LOW-FIELD 1/T1 OF TISSUE WATER PROTONS ARISE FROM MAGNETIZATION TRANSFER TO MACROMOLECULAR SOLID-STATE BROADENED LINES [J].
BROWN, RD ;
KOENIG, SH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 28 (01) :145-152
[4]   THE ORIGIN OF BIEXPONENTIAL T2 RELAXATION IN MUSCLE WATER [J].
COLE, WC ;
LEBLANC, AD ;
JHINGRAN, SG .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 29 (01) :19-24
[5]   MUSCULOSKELETAL MR-IMAGING AT 4 T AND AT 1.5 T - COMPARISON OF RELAXATION-TIMES AND IMAGE-CONTRAST [J].
DUEWELL, SH ;
CECKLER, TL ;
ONG, K ;
WEN, H ;
JAFFER, FA ;
CHESNICK, SA ;
BALABAN, RS .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (02) :551-555
[6]  
FORBES RM, 1953, J BIOL CHEM, V203, P359
[7]   PROTON MAGNETIC-RESONANCE RELAXATION BEHAVIOR OF WHOLE MUSCLE WITH FATTY INCLUSIONS [J].
FULLERTON, GD ;
CAMERON, IL ;
HUNTER, K ;
FULLERTON, HJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 155 (03) :727-730
[8]   NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE TRANSVERSE RELAXATION IN MUSCLE WATER [J].
FUNG, BM ;
PUON, PS .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1981, 33 (01) :27-38
[9]   SPIN LOCK MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE DIFFERENTIATION OF HEPATIC HEMANGIOMAS AND METASTASES [J].
HALAVAARA, JT ;
LAMMINEN, AE ;
BONDESTAM, S ;
SEPPONEN, RE ;
TANTTU, JI .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (815) :1198-1203
[10]   MAGNETIZATION-TRANSFER AND T-2 RELAXATION COMPONENTS IN TISSUE [J].
HARRISON, R ;
BRONSKILL, MJ ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 33 (04) :490-496