REDD plus and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review of the Biodiversity Goals, Monitoring Methods, and Impacts of 80 REDD+ Projects

被引:41
作者
Panfil, Steven N. [1 ]
Harvey, Celia A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Conservat Int, Betty & Gordon Moore Ctr Sci & Oceans, 2011 Crystal Dr Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2016年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
Afforestation; biodiversity conservation; biodiversity monitoring; Climate; Community and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards; co-benefits; Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD); forest carbon projects; REDD; safeguards; reforestation;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12188
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) presents an unprecedented opportunity to conserve biodiversity, but whether these biodiversity benefits are delivered will depend on how REDD+ is designed and implemented. In order to inform ongoing policy discussions on REDD+ and biodiversity, we examined how 80 existing REDD+ projects are addressing biodiversity issues, assessing the types of biodiversity benefits these projects aim to provide, the activities they are undertaking to achieve biodiversity goals, their plans for monitoring biodiversity, and the types of biodiversity impacts they are delivering. While all 80 REDD+ projects described biodiversity conservation goals, these goals typically lacked specificity. Furthermore, in 33 of 80 projects, there was a lack of coherence across the stated biodiversity goals, project activities and intended monitoring plans. The lack of specific goals and logical links between these goals, project interventions and monitoring suggests that the projects will have difficulty achieving and measuring biodiversity impacts. Future REDD+ projects and national level REDD+ programs could enhance the biodiversity outcomes by more explicitly articulating biodiversity goals, carefully identifying and addressing threats to biodiversity, tailoring interventions and monitoring plans to specific goals and threats, and more explicitly linking REDD+ activities to national biodiversity conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 150
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Social and Biodiversity Impact Assessment (SBIA) Manual for REDD+ Projects: Part 1-Core Guidance for Project Proponents
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 10 M C PARTIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], CLIM COMM BIOD PROJ
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MONITORING FOREST BI, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781849775106
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MEASURES SUCCESS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, REP OP WORK GROUP GE
[7]   The critical importance of considering fire in REDD+ programs [J].
Barlow, Jos ;
Parry, Luke ;
Gardner, Toby A. ;
Ferreira, Joice ;
Aragao, Luiz E. O. C. ;
Carmenta, Rachel ;
Berenguer, Erika ;
Vieira, Ima C. G. ;
Souza, Carlos ;
Cochrane, Mark A. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 154 :1-8
[8]   Assessing community-based conservation projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes [J].
Brooks J. ;
Waylen K.A. ;
Mulder M.B. .
Environmental Evidence, 2 (1)
[9]   Supplementing REDD+ with Biodiversity Payments: The Paradox of Paying for Multiple Ecosystem Services [J].
Busch, Jonah .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2013, 89 (04) :655-675
[10]  
Climate Community and Biodiversity Alliance, 2005, CLIM COMM BIOD PROJ