Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia

被引:56
作者
de Gelder, B
Rouw, R
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Cognit Neurosci Lab, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Louvain, Fac Med, Neurophysiol Lab, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
object perception; face perception; visual agnosia; prosopagnosia; inversion effect;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00039-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Selective impairment in recognition of faces (prosopagnosia) has been advanced as an argument for a brain module dedicated to face processing and focusing on the specific configural properties of faces. Loss of the inversion effect supposedly strengthened the argument ([10]: de Gelder B, Bachoud-Levi AC, Degos JD. Inversion superiority in visual agnosia may be common to a variety of orientation polarised objects besides faces. Vision Research, 1998;38:2855-61; [20]: Farah MJ, Wilson K, Drain H, Tanaka J. The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research 1995b;35:2089-93). The present study of prosopagnosic patient LH reports that he has lost the normal pattern of superior performance with upright faces and objects and shows instead paradoxical inversion effect for faces but also for objects. Experiment 2 investigated whether LH's use of features based route for processing upright objects would be hindered by the whole-based encoding when processing upright objects. The data show the same context effect for objects as was found for faces. Therefore the inversion effect does not present decisive evidence for the existence of a face module. Moreover, the importance of configuration-based recognition known to be crucial for face processing, must also be taken seriously for object recognition. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1279
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   INVERSION AND CONFIGURATION OF FACES [J].
BARTLETT, JC ;
SEARCY, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 25 (03) :281-316
[2]   Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition [J].
Biederman, I ;
Kalocsai, P .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 352 (1358) :1203-1219
[3]  
BRUYER R, 1992, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V30, P501
[4]   FROM PIECEMEAL TO CONFIGURATIONAL REPRESENTATION OF FACES [J].
CAREY, S ;
DIAMOND, R .
SCIENCE, 1977, 195 (4275) :312-314
[5]  
Carey S., 1994, VIS COGN, V1, P253, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13506289408402302, 10.1080/13506289408402302]
[6]   PROSOPAGNOSIA - ANATOMIC BASIS AND BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS [J].
DAMASIO, AR ;
DAMASIO, H ;
VANHOESEN, GW .
NEUROLOGY, 1982, 32 (04) :331-341
[7]  
DAMASIO AR, 1990, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V13, P89, DOI 10.1146/annurev.neuro.13.1.89
[8]   THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF FACES - SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL FACTORS [J].
DAVIDOFF, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1986, 40 (06) :391-400
[9]   RECOGNITION OF UNFAMILIAR FACES IN PROSOPAGNOSIA [J].
DAVIDOFF, J ;
LANDIS, T .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1990, 28 (11) :1143-1161
[10]   Structural encoding precludes recognition of face parts in prosopagnosia [J].
de Gelder, B ;
Rouw, R .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 17 (1-3) :89-102