A tale of four cities: Medicare reform and competitive pricing

被引:27
作者
Dowd, B [1 ]
Coulam, R
Feldman, R
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Hlth Serv Res & Policy, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] ABT Associates Inc, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The current payment system for Medicare+Choice (M+C) plans is based on prices calculated from administrative records. This system has been criticized as arbitrary, inefficient, and unfair. Most Medicare reform proposals would replace the current payment system with some form of competitive pricing. However, efforts over the past five years to demonstrate competitive pricing for M+C plans have been blocked repeatedly by Congress, even when the demonstrations were directly responsive to a congressional mandate. In the absence of political support, a demonstration of competitive pricing may be infeasible, and Congress could be forced to take the risky step of implementing broad Medicare reforms with very little information about their effects.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 29
页数:21
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION 0522
[2]  
BROCK B, 1999, WINTER HAVEN NE 0703
[3]  
BROWN RS, 1993, HLTH CARE FINANC FAL, P7
[4]  
BUTLER SM, 1995, HLTH AFFAIRS WIN, P47
[5]  
*COMP PRIC ADV COM, 1999, REP SECR DEP HLTH HU
[6]  
COULAM RF, 1990, REV REIMBURSEMENT ME
[7]  
DOWD, 1988, COMPETITIVE PRICING
[8]  
DOWD, COMPETITIVE PRICING
[9]   ISSUES REGARDING HEALTH PLAN PAYMENTS UNDER MEDICARE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORM [J].
DOWD, B ;
CHRISTIANSON, J ;
FELDMAN, R ;
WISNER, C ;
KLEIN, J .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1992, 70 (03) :423-453
[10]  
DOWD BE, 1996, COMPETITIVE PRICING