Characteristics of Planned and Unplanned Home Births in 19 States

被引:37
作者
Declercq, Eugene
MacDorman, Marian F.
Menacker, Fay
Stotland, Naomi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
关键词
PERINATAL-MORTALITY RATES; HOSPITAL BIRTHS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e21f6d
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the differences in the characteristics of mothers having planned and unplanned home births that occurred at home in a 19-state reporting area in the United States in 2006. METHODS: Data are from the 2006 U. S. vital statistics natality file. Information on whether a home birth was planned or unplanned was available from 19 states, representing 49% of all home births nationally. Data were examined by maternal age, race or ethnicity, education, marital status, live birth order, birthplace of mother, gestational age, prenatal care, smoking status, state, population of county of residence, and birth attendant. We could not identify planned home births that resulted in a transfer to the hospital. RESULTS: Of the 11,787 home births with planning status recorded in the 19 states studied here, 9,810 (83.2%) were identified as planned home births. The proportion of all births that occurred at home that were planned varied from 54% to 98% across states. Unplanned home births are more likely to involve mothers who are non-white, younger, unmarried, foreign-born, smokers, not college-educated, and with no prenatal care. Unplanned home births are also more likely to be preterm and to be attended by someone who is neither a doctor nor a midwife and is listed as either "other" or " unknown." CONCLUSION: Planned and unplanned home births differ substantially in characteristics, and distinctions need to be drawn between the two in subsequent analyses. (Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:93-9)
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 99
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2007, HOME BIRTHS US
[2]  
[Anonymous], NATL VITAL STAT REPO
[3]  
BLOCK J, 2007, PAINFUL TRUTH CHILDB
[4]   Staying Home to Give Birth: Why Women in the United States Choose Home Birth [J].
Boucher, Debora ;
Bennett, Catherine ;
McFarlin, Barbara ;
Freeze, Rixa .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 54 (02) :119-126
[5]  
Calhoun Ada, 2008, Time, V172, P57
[6]   Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 low-risk planned home and hospital births [J].
de Jonge, A. ;
van der Goes, B. Y. ;
Ravelli, A. C. J. ;
Amelink-Verburg, M. P. ;
Mol, B. W. ;
Nijhuis, J. G. ;
Gravenhorst, J. Bennebroek ;
Buitendijk, S. E. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (09) :1177-1184
[7]  
Department of Health, 1993, CHANG CHILDB REP EXP
[8]  
Division of Vital Statistics NCHS, 2000, REP PAN EV US STAND
[9]   Estimating intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births: when the 'best' available data are not good enough [J].
Gyte, G. ;
Dodwell, M. ;
Newburn, M. ;
Sandall, J. ;
Macfarlane, A. ;
Bewley, S. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (07) :933-942
[10]   Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in the Netherlands [J].
Hendrix, M. ;
Van Horck, M. ;
Moreta, D. ;
Nieman, F. ;
Nieuwenhuijze, M. ;
Severens, J. ;
Nijhuis, J. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 116 (04) :537-542