Quantitative genetics of growth and cryptic evolution of body size in an island population

被引:74
作者
Wilson, A. J.
Pemberton, J. M.
Pilkington, J. G.
Clutton-Brock, T. H.
Coltman, D. W.
Kruuk, L. E. B.
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolut Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Biol Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
heritability; Ovis aries; ontogeny; cryptic evolytion; growth;
D O I
10.1007/s10682-006-9106-z
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
While evolution occurs when selection acts on a heritable trait, empirical studies of natural systems have frequently reported phenotypic stasis under these conditions. We performed quantitative genetic analyses of weight and hindleg length in a free-living population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) to test whether genetic constraints can explain previously reported stasis in body size despite evidence for strong positive directional selection. Genetic, maternal and environmental covariance structures were estimated across ontogeny using random regression animal models. Heritability increased with age for weight and hindleg length, though both measures of size were highly heritable across ontogeny. Genetic correlations among ages were generally strong and uniformly positive, and the covariance structures were also highly integrated across ontogeny. Consequently, we found no constraint to the evolution of larger size itself. Rather we expect size at all ages to increase in response to positive selection acting at any age. Consistent with expectation, predicted breeding values for age-specific size traits have increased over a twenty-year period, while maternal performance for offspring size has declined. Re-examination of the phenotypic data confirmed that sheep are not getting larger, but also showed that there are significant negative trends in size at all ages. The genetic evolution is therefore cryptic, with the response to selection presumably being masked at the phenotypic level by a plastic response to changing environmental conditions. Density-dependence, coupled with systematically increasing population size, may contribute to declining body size but is insufficient to completely explain it. Our results demonstrate that an increased understanding of the genetic basis of quantitative traits, and of how plasticity and microevolution can occur simultaneously, is necessary for developing predictive models of phenotypic change in nature.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 356
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer)
[2]   CONSTRAINTS ON PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION [J].
ARNOLD, SJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 140 :S85-S107
[3]  
Badyaev AV, 2000, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V13, P290
[4]   Variation in growth in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) [J].
Bjorklund, M .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 1997, 10 (02) :139-155
[5]   The evolution of body size: What keeps organisms small? [J].
Blanckenhorn, WU .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) :385-407
[6]   A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change [J].
Blows, MW ;
Hoffmann, AA .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (06) :1371-1384
[7]   Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations [J].
Charmantier, A ;
Garant, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 272 (1571) :1415-1425
[8]   QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY .1. ONTOGENETIC CHANGES IN QUANTITATIVE GENETIC VARIANCE-COMPONENTS IN RANDOMBRED MICE [J].
CHEVERUD, JM ;
LEAMY, LJ ;
ATCHLEY, WR ;
RUTLEDGE, JJ .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1983, 42 (01) :65-75
[9]  
CHEVERUD JM, 1983, EVOLUTION, V37, P895, DOI [10.2307/2408405, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05619.x]
[10]  
Clutton-Brock TH., 2004, Soay sheep: dynamics and selection in an island population, P304