Trip distribution modeling with Twitter data

被引:44
作者
Pourebrahim, Nastaran [1 ]
Sultana, Selima [1 ]
Niakanlahiji, Amirreza [2 ]
Thill, Jean-Claude [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Geog Environm & Sustainabil, 1400 Spring Garden St, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Software & Informat Syst, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial neural networks; Random forests; Travel demand modeling; Social media; Volunteered geographic information; Twitter; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION TREES; RANDOM FOREST; TRANSPORT; MOBILITY; PATTERNS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; SYSTEM; SPRAWL;
D O I
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101354
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Integrating both traditional and social media data, this study compares the performance of gravity, neural network, and random forest models of commuting trip distribution in New York City. Trip distribution modeling has primarily employed traditional data sources and classical methods such as the gravity. However, with the emergence of social media during the past decade, the potential for integrating traditional and social media data while utilizing new techniques has been identified. Our findings indicate that the random forest model outperforms the traditional gravity and neural network models. Population, distance, number of Twitter users, and employment were identified as the four most influential predictors of trip distibution by the random forest model. While Twitter flows did not enhance the models' performance, the importance of the number of Twitter users at work destinations implies the potential for using social media data in travel demand modeling to improve the predictive power and accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Trees vs Neurons: Comparison between random forest and ANN for high-resolution prediction of building energy consumption [J].
Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem ;
Mourshed, Monjur ;
Rezgui, Yacine .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 147 :77-89
[2]  
Amita J., 2015, INT J TRAFFIC TRANSP, V5, P410, DOI [10.7708/ijtte.2015.5(4).06, DOI 10.7708/IJTTE.2015.5(4).06]
[3]   Transport modelling in the age of big data [J].
Anda, Cuauhtemoc ;
Erath, Alexander ;
Fourie, Pieter Jacobus .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN SCIENCES, 2017, 21 :19-42
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, FOUNDATIONS
[5]   Four-step travel demand model implementation for estimating traffic volumes on rural low-volume roads in Wyoming [J].
Apronti, Dick T. ;
Ksaibati, Khaled .
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 41 (05) :557-571
[6]  
ArcGIS, 2018, N AM DET STREETS
[7]   An agent-based evaluation of impacts of transport developments on the modal shift in Tehran, Iran [J].
Babakan, Ali Shirzadi ;
Alimohammadi, Abbas ;
Taleai, Mohammad .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS, 2015, 7 (02) :230-251
[8]   Human mobility: Models and applications [J].
Barbosa, Hugo ;
Barthelemy, Marc ;
Ghoshal, Gourab ;
James, Charlotte R. ;
Lenormand, Maxime ;
Louail, Thomas ;
Menezes, Ronaldo ;
Ramasco, Jose J. ;
Simini, Filippo ;
Tomasini, Marcello .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2018, 734 :1-74
[9]  
Beale M.H., 2015, MathWorks, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471221546
[10]   Predicting human mobility through the assimilation of social media traces into mobility models [J].
Beiro, Mariano G. ;
Panisson, Andre ;
Tizzoni, Michele ;
Cattuto, Ciro .
EPJ DATA SCIENCE, 2016, 5