Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears - Including initial biopsy results

被引:105
作者
Bishop, JW
Bigner, SH
Colgan, TJ
Husain, M
Howell, LP
McIntosh, KM
Taylor, DA
Sadeghi, MH
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[5] Toronto Hosp, Dept Pathol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[6] Toronto Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Kaiser Reg Lab, Berkeley, CA USA
[9] Lab Corp Amer, Wichita, KS USA
[10] So Calif Permanente Med Grp, Reg Cytopathol Dept, N Hollywood, CA USA
[11] Lab Corp Amer, Burlington, NC USA
[12] MDS Labs, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] Cytopathol Histopathol Associates, Detroit, MI USA
[14] Sinai Hosp, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
cervical smears; mass screening; cervix neoplasms; AutoCyte PREP; CytoRich;
D O I
10.1159/000331545
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance and liquid-based cell preparations from the AutoCyte PREP system (AutoCyte, Inc., Elon College, North Carolina) with the conventional cervical smear in masked, split-sample, multisite trials. STUDY DESIGN: The AutoCyte PREP system utilizes the CytoRich method, which combines liquid preservation, selective reduction of blood and inflammation, thin-layer cell dispersion and discrete staining. In an eight-site multicenter trial, 8,983 cases were evaluated. Parallel AutoCyte PREP slides and matching conventional cervical cytologic smears were screened in a masked fashion, with all abnormals reviewed in It masked, on-site pathologist review. The conventional smear was always prepared first, with the AutoCyte PREP using the residual cells on the collection device. The Bethesda System teas used for reporting diagnosis and specimen adequacy. RESULTS: Of the cases, 7,805 (86.9%) had the same interpretation. In 8,750 cases (97.4%), there was agreement within one diagnostic category. The AutoCyte PREP demonstrated a statistically significant, 31% overall improvement in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesion and invasive cancer when evaluating cases with more than one diagnostic class difference. Biopsy correlation of available data supported the improvement observed in the cytology-based comparison. Recovery of infectious organisms and endocervical component teas comparable between preparations, especially in light of the split-sample study design. There was a 39% reduction in unsatisfactory slides and 44% fewer satisfactory but limited by reports. CONCLUSION: The AutoCyte PREP and CytoRich method produce excellent cellular presentations with standardized quality, superior sensitivity and improved adequacy as compared to the conventional method.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 197
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条