Matrix effect and cross-reactivity of select amphetamine-type substances, designer analogues, and putrefactive amines using the Bio-Quant Direct ELISA presumptive assays for amphetamine and methamphetamine

被引:33
作者
Apollonio, Luigino G. [1 ]
Whittall, Ian R.
Pianca, Dennis J.
Kyd, Jennelle M.
Maher, William A.
机构
[1] Univ Canberra, Natl Ctr Forens Studies, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] ACT Govt Analyt Lab, Dept Toxicol & Forens Chem, Weston, ACT 2611, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jat/31.4.208
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the Bio-Quant Direct ELISA assays for amphetamine and methamphetamine in the routine presumptive screening of biological fluids. Standard concentration curves of the target analytes were assayed to assess sensitivity, and known concentrations of common amphetamine-type substances (ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phentermine), designer analogues (MDA, MDMA, MDEA, MBDB, PMA, 4-MTA, 2CB), and putrefactive amines (phenylethylamine, putrescine, tryptamine, tyramine) were analyzed to determine cross-reactivity. Results of the standard curve studies show the capacity of both Direct ELISA kits to confidently detect down to 3 ng/mL interday (PBS matrix; CVs 6.3-15.5%). Cross-reactivity relative to that of 50 ng/mL preparations of the target compounds demonstrated that the Direct ELISA kit for amphetamine also detected MDA (282%), PMA (265%), 4-MTA (280%), and phentermine (61%), and the Direct ELISA for methamphetamine also assayed positive for MDMA (73%), MDEA (18%), pseudoephedrine (19%), MBDB (8%), and ephedrine (9%). Matrix studies demonstrated that both ELISA kits could be applied to screening of blood, urine, and saliva to a concentration of 6 ng/mL or lower. In conclusion, the Bio-Quant Direct ELISA kits for amphetamine and methamphetamine are fast and accurate and have demonstrated themselves to be useful tools in routine toxicological testing.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 213
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY DETECTION OF AMPHETAMINE, METHAMPHETAMINE, AND ILLICIT AMPHETAMINE ANALOGS [J].
CODY, JT ;
SCHWARZHOFF, R .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 17 (01) :26-30
[2]  
Collison IB, 1998, J FORENSIC SCI, V43, P390
[3]   Validation of the Cozart® Amphetamine Microplate EIA for the analysis of amphetamines in oral fluid [J].
Cooper, Gail ;
Wilson, Lisa ;
Reid, Claire ;
Hand, Chris ;
Spiehler, Vina .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 159 (2-3) :104-112
[4]  
Crowther Jr, 2000, METH MOL B, V149, pV
[5]   EVALUATION OF 6 COMMERCIAL AMPHETAMINE AND METHAMPHETAMINE IMMUNOASSAYS FOR CROSS-REACTIVITY TO PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE AND EPHEDRINE IN URINE [J].
DNICUOLA, J ;
JONES, R ;
LEVINE, B ;
SMITH, ML .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 16 (04) :211-213
[6]   Postmortem drug analysis: Analytical and toxicological aspects [J].
Drummer, OH ;
Gerostamoulos, J .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2002, 24 (02) :199-209
[8]  
Felscher D, 2000, J FORENSIC SCI, V45, P1327
[9]   Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective [J].
Findlay, JWA ;
Smith, WC ;
Lee, JW ;
Nordblom, GD ;
Das, I ;
DeSilva, BS ;
Khan, MN ;
Bowsher, RR .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2000, 21 (06) :1249-1273
[10]   Performance of immunoassays in screening for opiates, cannabinoids and amphetamines in post-mortem blood [J].
Hino, Y ;
Qjanperä, I ;
Rasanen, I ;
Vuori, E .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 131 (2-3) :148-155