Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1C and T2 prostate cancer: Results from the search database

被引:17
作者
Freedland, SJ
Presti, JC
Terris, MK
Kane, CJ
Aronson, WJ
Dorey, F
Amling, CL
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Vet Adm Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Urol Sect, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
[6] USN, Ctr Med, Dept Urol, San Diego, CA 92152 USA
[7] Med Coll Georgia, Div Urol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; biopsy; recurrence;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000065763.21602.14
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: A number of studies have failed to show significant differences in outcome following radical prostatectomy between men with palpable, clinically localized prostate cancer (cT2) and those whose tumors are not palpable (cT1c). We determined whether we could improve the prognostic value of the TNM staging system in men with cT1c and cT2 cancers by including information on whether prostate needle biopsy was unilaterally or bilaterally positive. Materials and Methods: A retrospective survey of 992 patients from the SEARCH (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital) Database treated with radical prostatectomy at 4 equal access medical centers between 1988 and 2002 was done. TNM 1992 clinical stage was T1c in 421 patients, T2a in 287, T2b in 202 and T2c in 82. Multivariate analysis was used to examine whether biopsy laterality and clinical stage were significant predictors of surgical margin status, nonorgan confined disease, seminal vesicle invasion, and time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Results: Patients with clinical stages T2b and T2c cancers had similar rates of PSA recurrence, which were significantly higher than in patients with T1c and T2a disease, who also had similar rates of PSA recurrence. Bilateral positive biopsy further stratified patients with T1c and T2a disease (p = 0.01) but not those with T2b and T2c cancers (p = 0.207). Grouping these 1992 clinical stages with biopsy laterality resulted in a new clinical staging system, which was a significant predictor of PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis whether TNM clinical stage was evaluated as a categorical or continuous variable only PSA, biopsy Gleason score and the new clinical staging system (1992 TNM stage groupings combined with biopsy laterality) were significant independent predictors of time to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Conclusions: Combining low (T1c and T2a) and high (T2b and T2c) risk 1992 clinical stages with biopsy laterality (unilateral versus bilateral positive) resulted in a new clinical staging system that was a stronger predictor of PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy than the 1992 or 1997 TNM clinical staging system. If confirmed at other centers and in men who undergo with other treatment modalities, consideration should be given to revising the current TNM staging system to reflect these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:2129 / 2135
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual
[2]  
Bostwick DG, 1997, EUR UROL, V32, P2
[3]   Analysis of clinical stage T2 prostate cancer: Do current subclassifications represent an improvement? [J].
Cagiannos, I ;
Graefen, M ;
Karakiewicz, PI ;
Ohori, M ;
Eastham, JA ;
Rabbani, F ;
Fair, W ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Haese, A ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Huland, H ;
Scardino, PT ;
Kattan, MW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (08) :2025-2030
[4]   Clinical staging of prostate cancer: Reproducibility and clarification of issues [J].
Campbell, T ;
Blasko, J ;
Crawford, ED ;
Forman, J ;
Hanks, G ;
Kuban, D ;
Montie, J ;
Moul, J ;
Pollack, A ;
Raghavan, D ;
Ray, P ;
Roach, M ;
Steinberg, G ;
Stone, N ;
Thompson, I ;
Vogelzang, N ;
Vijayakumar, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 96 (03) :198-209
[5]   Contemporary results of anatomic radical prostatectomy [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Ramos, CG ;
Carvalhal, GF .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1999, 49 (05) :282-296
[6]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[7]   Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Fondurulia, J ;
Chen, MH ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Wein, A ;
Richie, JP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (06) :1164-1172
[8]   PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CONTRALATERAL BIOPSIES IN UNILATERALLY PALPABLE PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
DANIELS, GF ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :870-874
[9]  
Fleming ID, 1997, AJCC CANC STAGING MA, P219
[10]   Race as an outcome predictor after radical prostatectomy: Results from the shared equal access regional cancer hospital (search) database [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Amling, CL ;
Dorey, F ;
Kane, CJ ;
Presti, JC ;
Terris, MK ;
Aronson, WJ .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) :670-674