Prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:146
作者
Shimada, M
Takenaka, K
Taguchi, K
Fujiwara, Y
Gion, T
Kajiyama, K
Maeda, T
Shirabe, K
Yanaga, K
Sugimachi, K
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Surg 2, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 812, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Pathol 2, Fukuoka 812, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-199801000-00012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The aims of this study were to identify prognostic factors in patients who developed recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after repeat hepatectomy and to elucidate the role of multicentric occurrence in the second tumor after a first hepatectomy. Summary Background Data A repeat hepatectomy for recurrent HCC has been established as the most effective treatment modality, whenever it is possible. However, the prognostic factors for recurrent HCC after repeat hepatectomy have yet to be clarified. Methods Forty-one patients who underwent a curative repeat hepatectomy were retrospectively studied. Patient survival and disease-free survival after recurrence were univariately and multivariately analyzed using 38 clinicopathologic variables. The histologic grade of HCC at repeat hepatectomy was also compared with that at first hepatectomy. Results Patient survival after repeat hepatectomy did not differ substantially from that in 312 patients undergoing primary hepatectomy. However, the disease-free survival after repeat hepatectomy was significantly lower than that in patients with only a primary hepatectomy (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed only portal vein invasion in the first hepatectomy to be an independent and significantly poor prognostic factor. Regarding multicentric occurrence at repeal hepatectomy, only 6 of 40 patients (15%) whose specimens could be evaluated histologically were determined to be Edmondson and Steiner's Grade 1. Conclusions The only prognostic factor identified in patients with recurrent HCC after repeat hepatectomy was portal vein invasion in the first hepatectomy. Most second tumors after the first hepatectomy are considered to be caused by metastatic recurrence, not by multicentric occurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 85
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] CHEN MF, 1994, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V129, P738
  • [2] COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
  • [3] EDMONDSON HA, 1954, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V7, P462, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-E
  • [5] HSU HC, 1991, HEPATOLOGY, V13, P923, DOI 10.1002/hep.1840130520
  • [6] HUGUET C, 1990, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V171, P398
  • [7] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING HEPATIC RESECTION
    IZUMI, R
    SHIMIZU, K
    II, T
    YAGI, M
    MATSUI, O
    NONOMURA, A
    MIYAZAKI, I
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (03) : 720 - 727
  • [8] KANAI T, 1987, CANCER, V60, P810, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19870815)60:4<810::AID-CNCR2820600417>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-1
  • [10] A 5-YEAR EXPERIENCE OF LIPIODOLIZATION - SELECTIVE REGIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR 200 PATIENTS WITH HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA
    KANEMATSU, T
    FURUTA, T
    TAKENAKA, K
    MATSUMATA, T
    YOSHIDA, Y
    NISHIZAKI, T
    HASUO, K
    SUGIMACHI, K
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 1989, 10 (01) : 98 - 102