Progress in sensor technology - progress in process control? Part II: results from a simulation benchmark study

被引:9
作者
Alex, J [1 ]
Rieger, L
Winkler, S
Siegrist, H
机构
[1] Ifak, Inst Automat & Commun, D-39179 Barleben, Germany
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Environm Sci & Technol, EAWAG, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[3] Vienna Tech Univ, Inst Water Qual & Waste Management, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
关键词
benchmark simulation; control strategy evaluation; plant dynamics; process control; sensor model;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2003.0098
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To show the impact of sensor behaviour on the control result, four strategies for aeration control are tested using different sensor characteristics. It is demonstrated, on the one hand, how an increasing response time will limit the achievable control quality and, on the other hand, how a given sensor characteristic can be taken into account for the controller design. The presented tests show that an improvement potential by control for WWTPs is available but this potential is limited compared to proper DO control with fixed set-points. To activate this control potential, sufficient control authority must be available and a careful control design is required. It can be shown that using feedback control, sensors with a small response time have significant advantages compared to conventional sensors. Using feed forward control, the improvement potential by control is considerably higher and additionally, the sensor delay can be integrated into the controller design. The presented discussion is based on simulation studies performed on a standardised benchmark case. For these tests it was necessary to include sensor models into the simulation model. It can be stated that the usage of sensor models is necessary for the application of dynamic simulation for the design and evaluation of WWTP control and in general to achieve realistic results.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 120
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
ALEX J, 1999, P ECC 99
[2]  
Copp B., 2002, The COST Simulation Benchmark-Description and Simulator Manual
[3]  
COPP JB, 1999, IWA SIMULATION BENCH
[4]  
Henze M., 2000, 9 IWA TASK GROUP MAT
[5]   Exploiting online in-situ ammonium, nitrate and phosphate sensors in full-scale wastewater plant operation [J].
Ingildsen, P ;
Olsson, G .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (4-5) :139-147
[6]   Progress in sensor technology - progress in process control? Part I: Sensor property investigation and classification [J].
Rieger, L ;
Alex, J ;
Winkler, S ;
Boehler, M ;
Thomann, M ;
Siegrist, H .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 47 (02) :103-112
[7]   In-situ measurement of ammonium and nitrate in the activated sludge process [J].
Rieger, L ;
Siegrist, H ;
Winkler, S ;
Saracevic, E ;
Votava, R ;
Nadler, J .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (4-5) :93-100
[8]   An efficient monitoring concept with control charts for on-line sensors [J].
Thomann, M ;
Rieger, L ;
Frommhold, S ;
Siegrist, H ;
Gujer, W .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (4-5) :107-116
[9]  
WINKLER S, 2002, P 3 IWA WORLD WAT C