Increasing barrier method use among oral contraceptive users at risk of STDs -: What approach is best?

被引:15
作者
Steiner, MJ
Glover, LH
Bou-Saada, I
Piedrahita, C
机构
[1] Family Hlth Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Brazos Valley Community Act Agcy, Family Hlth Clin, Bryan, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007435-199803000-00006
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: We evaluated whether offering a choice of barrier methods can increase overall barrier method use without decreasing condom use in women using oral contraceptives (OCs) for contraception. Study Design: We randomized 167 OC users at risk for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) into two groups, one receiving male latex condoms only (Condom group), the other receiving both male latex condoms and nonoxynol-9 film (Choice group). All participants received similar hierarchical STD protection counseling. We assessed method use with daily diaries. Results: The Choice group protected a significantly higher percentage of their coital acts with a barrier method (month 1 to 2: 29% vs. 22%; month 3 to 4: 33% vs. 21%; and month 5 to 6: 35% vs. 19%; adjusted P = 0.012). Condom use in the Choice group was higher as well (adjusted P = 0.036). When we used a transitional multilogistic regression approach to account for differential loss to follow-up in the two groups, results were similar. Conclusions: Offering a choice of barrier methods increased overall barrier method use without decreasing condom use.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 143
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   PREVALENCE OF AIDS-RELATED RISK-FACTORS AND CONDOM USE IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
CATANIA, JA ;
COATES, TJ ;
STALL, R ;
TURNER, H ;
PETERSON, J ;
HEARST, N ;
DOLCINI, MM ;
HUDES, E ;
GAGNON, J ;
WILEY, J ;
GROVES, R .
SCIENCE, 1992, 258 (5085) :1101-1106
[2]   FAMILY-PLANNING, SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED DISEASES AND CONTRACEPTIVE CHOICE - A LITERATURE UPDATE .1. [J].
CATES, W ;
STONE, KM .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1992, 24 (02) :75-84
[3]   A risk-assessment tool for integrated reproductive health services [J].
Cates, W .
INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 23 (01) :36-38
[4]   THE QUEST FOR WOMENS PROPHYLACTIC METHODS - HOPES VS SCIENCE [J].
CATES, W ;
STEWART, FH ;
TRUSSELL, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (11) :1479-1482
[5]  
CHEN PL, 1997, JOINT STAT M AM STAT
[6]  
CLEARY J, 1994, FEMALE CONDOM EFFICA
[7]  
Diggle P., 2002, Analysis of Longitudinal Data
[8]   Use of spermicide and impact of prophylactic condom use among sex workers in Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia [J].
Farr, G ;
Castro, LAA ;
DiSantostefano, R ;
Claassen, E ;
Olguin, F .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1996, 23 (03) :206-212
[9]   SHORT-TERM ACCEPTABILITY OF THE FEMALE CONDOM AMONG STAFF AND PATIENTS AT A NEW-YORK-CITY HOSPITAL [J].
GOLLUB, EL ;
STEIN, Z ;
ELSADR, W .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 27 (04) :155-158
[10]  
HATCHER RA, 1994, CONTRACEPTIVE TECHNO