Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent

被引:46
作者
Braun, Thomas M. [1 ]
Thall, Peter F.
Nguyen, Hoang
de Lima, Marcos
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Blood & Marrow Transplantat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/1740774507076934
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 [基础医学];
摘要
Background Traditionally, phase I clinical trial designs are based upon one predefined course of treatment while varying among patients the dose given at each administration. In actual medical practice, patients receive a schedule comprised of several courses of treatment, and some patients may receive one or more dose reductions or delays during treatment. Consequently, the overall risk of toxicity for each patient is a function of both actual schedule of treatment and the differing doses used at each adminstration. Purpose Our goal is to provide a practical phase I clinical trial design that more accurately reflects actual medical practice by accounting for both dose per administration and schedule. Methods We propose an outcome-adaptive Bayesian design that simultaneously optimizes both dose and schedule in terms of the overall risk of toxicity, based on time-to-toxicity outcomes. We use computer simulation as a tool to calibrate design parameters. Results We describe a phase I trial in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation that was designed and is currently being conducted using our new method. Our computer simulations demonstrate that our method outperforms any method that searches for an optimal dose but does not allow schedule to vary, both in terms of the probability of identifying optimal (dose, schedule) combinations, and the numbers of patients assigned to those combinations in the trial. Limitations Our design requires greater sample sizes than those seen in traditional phase I studies due to the larger number of treatment combinations examined. Our design also assumes that the effects of multiple administrations are independent of each other and that the hazard of toxicity is the same for all administrations. Conclusions Our design is the first for phase I clinical trials that is sufficiently flexible and practical to truly reflect clinical practice by varying both dose and the timing and number of administrations given to each patient.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 124
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2021, Bayesian Data Analysis
[2]
Babb J, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1103, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980530)17:10<1103::AID-SIM793>3.0.CO
[3]
2-9
[4]
Determining a maximum-tolerated schedule of a cytotoxic agent [J].
Braun, TM ;
Yuan, Z ;
Thall, PF .
BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (02) :335-343
[5]
DNA methylation and cancer [J].
Das, PM ;
Singal, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (22) :4632-4642
[6]
SOME PRACTICAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD FOR PHASE-I STUDIES [J].
GOODMAN, SN ;
ZAHURAK, ML ;
PIANTADOSI, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (11) :1149-1161
[7]
CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD - A PRACTICAL DESIGN FOR PHASE-1 CLINICAL-TRIALS IN CANCER [J].
OQUIGLEY, J ;
PEPE, M ;
FISHER, L .
BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (01) :33-48
[8]
DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PHASE-I CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
STORER, BE .
BIOMETRICS, 1989, 45 (03) :925-937
[9]
Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs [J].
Thall, PF ;
Cook, JD .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (03) :684-693
[10]
BAYESIAN-ESTIMATION OF ITEM RESPONSE CURVES [J].
TSUTAKAWA, RK ;
LIN, HY .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1986, 51 (02) :251-267