Cup-burner flame extinguishment by CF3Br and Br2

被引:41
作者
Linteris, Gregory T. [1 ]
Takahashi, Fumiaki
Katta, Viswanath R.
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Fire Res Div, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[2] NASA, Glenn Res Ctr, Natl Ctr Space Explorat Res Fluids & Combust, Cleveland, OH 44135 USA
[3] Innovat Sci Solut Inc, Dayton, OH 45440 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
fire suppression; cup burner; Halon replacement; flame extinction; CF3Br;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.12.013
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Experiments and calculations have been performed for a methane-air coflow diffusion flame, in the cup-burner configuration, with CF3Br or Br-2 added to the air stream. The time-dependent, two-dimensional numerical code, which includes a detailed kinetic model and diffusive transport, has predicted the flame extinction within 4 or 8% for each. Analysis of the flame structure has allowed the mechanisms of flame weakening in the base and trailing flame regions to be compared. The agents CF3Br and Br2 behave very similarly with regard to flame extinguishment: both raise the temperature in the flame everywhere, as well as lower radical volume fractions in the trailing diffusion flame and at the peak reactivity spot (the "reaction kernel") at the flame base where the flame is stabilized. The mechanism of lowered radical volume fractions is shown primarily to be due to a catalytic cycle involving bromine species in both regions of the flame, with small contributions from radical trapping by fluorinated species in the trailing diffusion flame. In the reaction kernel, the radical volume fractions are reduced more, and the catalytic radical recombination cycles are shown to be more effective as compared to in the trailing diffusion flame. At the latter location, the effectiveness of the agents is reduced because the hydrocarbon species, which are necessary for the regeneration of HBr, are scarce at the location of the peak radical volume fraction (i.e., at the flame zone), a limitation which does not exist in the reaction kernel, where there is good upstream mixing of the fuel and oxidizer because the base is lifted. That is, the premixed character of the reaction kernel actually allows the HBr in the catalytic cycle to be more effective there because of the effective overlap between the Br and the hydrocarbon species, which allows efficient regeneration of HBr. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 103
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN SO, 1987, FIRE J, V81, P56
[2]  
[Anonymous], P COMBUST I
[3]  
[Anonymous], S INT COMBUST
[4]   Chemical limits to flame inhibition [J].
Babushok, V ;
Tsang, W ;
Linteris, GT ;
Reinelt, D .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1998, 115 (04) :551-560
[5]   Influence of CF3I, CF3Br, and CF3H on the high-temperature combustion of methane [J].
Babushok, V ;
Noto, T ;
Burgess, DRF ;
Hamins, A ;
Tsang, W .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1996, 107 (04) :351-367
[6]  
BAJPAI SN, 1974, J FIRE FLAMMABILITY, V5, P255
[7]  
BattinLeclerc F, 1995, ACS SYM SER, V611, P289
[8]  
BILGER RW, 1988, P COMBUST INST, V22, P450
[9]  
BIORDI JC, 1973, P COMBUST INST, V14, P367
[10]   Suppression limits of low strain rate non-premixed methane flames [J].
Bundy, M ;
Hamins, A ;
Lee, KY .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2003, 133 (03) :299-310