The scope and limits of conscientious objection

被引:43
作者
Dickens, BM [1 ]
Cook, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Fac Law, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Joint Ctr Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
conscientious objection; abortion objection; sterilization objection; nurses' conscientious objection; pharmacists' conscientious objection; religiously-based hospitals; hospital conscientious objection; employment non-discrimination;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-7292(00)00330-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Principles of religious freedom protect physicians, nurses and others who refuse participation in medical procedures to which they hold conscientious objections. However, they cannot decline participation in procedures to save life or continuing health. Physicians who refuse to perform procedures on religious grounds must refer their patients to non-objecting practitioners. When physicians refuse to accept applicants as patients for procedures to which they object, governmental healthcare administrators must ensure that non-objecting providers are reasonably accessible. Nurses' conscientious objections to participate directly in procedures they find religiously offensive should be accommodated, but nurses cannot object to giving patients indirect aid. Medical and nursing students cannot object to be educated about procedures in which they would not participate, but may object to having to perform them under supervision. Hospitals cannot usually claim an institutional conscientious objection, nor discriminate against potential staff applicants who would not object to participation in particular procedures. (C) 2000 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Developing public policy for sectarian providers: Accommodating religious beliefs and obtaining access to care [J].
Boozang, KM .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 1996, 24 (02) :90-98
[2]   TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE PRINCIPLE OF DOUBLE EFFECT [J].
BOYLE, JM .
ETHICS, 1980, 90 (04) :527-538
[3]   Drug therapy - Medical termination of pregnancy [J].
Christin-Maitre, S ;
Bouchard, P ;
Spitz, IM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (13) :946-956
[4]   Some ethical and legal issues in assisted reproductive technology [J].
Dickens, BM ;
Cook, RJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1999, 66 (01) :55-61
[5]  
DOYAL L, 1994, PRINCIPLES HLTH CARE, P217
[6]   FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE, PROFESSIONAL-RESPONSIBILITY, AND ACCESS TO ABORTION [J].
DRESSER, RS .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 1994, 22 (03) :280-285
[7]  
MASON JK, 1998, MED LEGAL ASPECTS RE, P128
[8]   Religious exemptions to the immunization statutes: Balancing public health and religious freedom [J].
Ross, LF ;
Aspinwall, TJ .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 1997, 25 (2-3) :202-209
[9]  
Weinstein B D, 1992, Law Med Health Care, V20, P220
[10]  
WILLIAMS G, 1958, SANCTITY LIFE CRIMIN, P140