Offering a randomized trial of intensive therapy for IDDM to adolescents - Reasons for refusal, patient characteristics, and recruiter effects

被引:27
作者
Tercyak, KP
Johnson, SB
Kirkpatrick, KA
Silverstein, JH
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Pediat Psychol & Family Studies, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Endocrinol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.21.2.213
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To identify reasons adolescents refuse to participate in a randomized trial of intensive therapy (IT) for IDDM, to describe the patient characteristics of those who consent and those who refuse to participate, and to examine recruiter effects on trial participation rates. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 99 adolescents, age 11-18 years, were provided with the results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and approached for possible study participation by two nurse recruiters. Adolescents refusing the trial were administered a semi-structured interview to describe reasons for study refusal; responses were recorded and later coded into categories. Patient characteristics of consenters and refusers were collected and compared. The differential enrollment rates of the two nurse recruiters were also compared. RESULTS - A total of 56 patients (similar to 57%) agreed to participate; 43 refused. The four most common reasons for study refusal were 1) increased clinic visits (42%), 2) increased insulin injections (30%), 3) increased frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (28%), and 4) transportation difficulties (19%). Concerns about randomization to an unwanted treatment condition and fears of hypoglycemia or weight gain were rarely cited. Consenters and refusers did not differ in demographic characteristics, disease status, or family composition. Large differences were found between the two nurse recruiters. one experienced a 60% refusal rate, while the other experienced a 27% refusal rate. CONCLUSIONS - Issues of convenience (increased clinic visits, transportation difficulties) and concerns about the demands of IT (increased injections and SMBG) were the predominant reasons for trial refusal. Patient characteristics did not differentiate consenters from refusers. However, recruiters differed greatly in study refusal rates, suggesting that provider behavior may be an important but understudied aspect of adolescent acceptance of randomized trials in general and IT in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 215
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
BLAKESLEE S, 1994, NY TIMES A 0228, P1
[3]   How generalizable are the results of diabetes self-management research? The impact of participation and attrition [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Eakin, EG ;
Toobert, DJ .
DIABETES EDUCATOR, 1996, 22 (06) :573-&
[4]  
*SAS I, 1987, SAS 6 04 SOFTW COMP
[5]   THE EFFECT OF INTENSIVE TREATMENT OF DIABETES ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION OF LONG-TERM COMPLICATIONS IN INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
SHAMOON, H ;
DUFFY, H ;
FLEISCHER, N ;
ENGEL, S ;
SAENGER, P ;
STRELZYN, M ;
LITWAK, M ;
WYLIEROSETT, J ;
FARKASH, A ;
GEIGER, D ;
ENGEL, H ;
FLEISCHMAN, J ;
POMPI, D ;
GINSBERG, N ;
GLOVER, M ;
BRISMAN, M ;
WALKER, E ;
THOMASHUNIS, A ;
GONZALEZ, J ;
GENUTH, S ;
BROWN, E ;
DAHMS, W ;
PUGSLEY, P ;
MAYER, L ;
KERR, D ;
LANDAU, B ;
SINGERMAN, L ;
RICE, T ;
NOVAK, M ;
SMITHBREWER, S ;
MCCONNELL, J ;
DROTAR, D ;
WOODS, D ;
KATIRGI, B ;
LITVENE, M ;
BROWN, C ;
LUSK, M ;
CAMPBELL, R ;
LACKAYE, M ;
RICHARDSON, M ;
LEVY, B ;
CHANG, S ;
HEINHEINEMANN, M ;
BARRON, S ;
ASTOR, L ;
LEBECK, D ;
BRILLON, D ;
DIAMOND, B ;
VASILASDWOSKIN, A ;
LAURENZI, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (14) :977-986
[6]  
Tamborlane William V., 1994, Clinical Diabetes, V12, P115
[7]   How have patients reacted to the implications of the DCCT? [J].
Thompson, CJ ;
Cummings, JFR ;
Chalmers, J ;
Gould, C ;
Newton, RW .
DIABETES CARE, 1996, 19 (08) :876-879
[8]  
*US DEP HHS, 1994, NIH PUBL