Updating the Minimal Important Difference for Six-Minute Walk Distance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

被引:349
作者
Holland, Anne E. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hill, Catherine J. [3 ,4 ]
Rasekaba, Tshepo [1 ]
Lee, Annemarie [1 ,6 ]
Naughton, Matthew T. [5 ,7 ]
McDonald, Christine F. [4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Physiotherapy Dept, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Austin Hlth, Physiotherapy Dept, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Inst Breathing & Sleep, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Alfred Hosp, Dept Allergy Immunol & Resp Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Sch Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Sch Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[8] Austin Hlth, Dept Resp & Sleep Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2010年 / 91卷 / 02期
关键词
Exercise test; Outcome assessment; Pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive; Rehabilitation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; HEALTH-STATUS; COPD; REHABILITATION; RESPONSIVENESS; MEANINGFUL; STRATEGIES; STATEMENT; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.017
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Holland AE, Hill CJ, Rasekaba T, Lee A, Naughton MT, McDonald CF. Updating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:221-5. Objective: To establish the minimal important difference (MID) for the six-minute walk distance (6MWD) in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Design: Analysis of data from an observational study using distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the MID in 6MWD. Setting: Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program at 2 teaching hospitals. Participants: Seventy-five patients with COPD (44 men) in a stable clinical state with mean age 70 years (SD 9y), forced expiratory volume in one second 52% (SD 21%) predicted and baseline walking distance 359 meters (SD 104m). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Participants completed the six-minute walk test before and after a 7-week pulmonary rehabilitation program. Participants and clinicians completed a global rating of change score while blinded to the change in 6MWD. Results: The mean change in 6MWD in participants who reported themselves to be unchanged was 17.7 meters, compared with 60.2 meters in those who reported small change and 78.4 meters in those who reported substantial change (P=.004). Anchor-based methods identified an MID of 25 meters (95% confidence interval 20-61m). There was excellent agreement with distribution-based methods (25.5-26.5 m, kappa=.95). A change in 6MWD of 14% compared with baseline also represented a clinically important effect; this threshold was less sensitive than for absolute change (sensitivity .70 vs .85). Conclusions: The MID for 6MWD in COPD is 25 meters. Absolute change in 6MWD is a more sensitive indicator than percentage change from baseline. These data support the use of 6MWD as a patient-important outcome in research and clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 225
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J RESP CRIT CARE
[3]   Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Boers, M ;
Wells, GA .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) :109-114
[4]   Validation and comparison of reference equations for the 6-min walk distance test [J].
Cote, C. G. ;
Casanova, C. ;
Marin, J. M. ;
Lopez, M. V. ;
Pinto-Plata, V. ;
de Oca, M. M. ;
Dordelly, L. J. ;
Nekach, H. ;
Celli, B. R. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2008, 31 (03) :571-578
[5]   Power of outcome measurements to detect clinically significant changes in pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with COPD [J].
de Torres, JP ;
Pinto-Plata, V ;
Ingenito, E ;
Bagley, P ;
Gray, A ;
Berger, R ;
Celli, B .
CHEST, 2002, 121 (04) :1092-1098
[6]   REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES - STATISTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHR, P ;
PATRICK, DL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S142-S158
[7]  
Fishman A, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V348, P2059
[8]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[9]   The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research - How meaningful is it? [J].
Hays, RD ;
Woolley, JM .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 18 (05) :419-423
[10]   Is the SF-36 a valid measure of change in population health? Results from the Whitehall II study [J].
Hemingway, H ;
Stafford, M ;
Stansfeld, S ;
Shipley, M ;
Marmot, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7118) :1273-1279