Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information

被引:96
作者
Rosenbaum, Sarah E. [1 ]
Glenton, Claire [2 ]
Oxman, Andrew D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Knowledge Ctr Hlth Serv, Dept Commun, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
[2] SINTEF, Dept Global Hlth, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Knowledge translation; Health numeracy; Risk communication; Systematic reviews; Information design; Randomized controlled trial; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH-RISK; NUMERACY; ABSTRACTS; DOCTORS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objective: To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review. Study Design and Setting: We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT 1, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results. Results: RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n = 47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n = 25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P = 0.021). RCT 11: Participants with the SoF table (n = 18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n = 15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P = 0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P < 0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P = 0.002). Conclusion: In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 626
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review [J].
Ancker, Jessica S. ;
Kaufman, David .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 14 (06) :713-721
[2]
Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review [J].
Ancker, Jessica S. ;
Senathirajah, Yalini ;
Kukafka, Rita ;
Starren, Justin B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 13 (06) :608-618
[3]
The impact of open access upon public health [J].
不详 .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (05) :563-563
[4]
[Anonymous], 2005, ACP Journal Club
[5]
[Anonymous], 2007, Psychological science in the public interest, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6053.2008.00033.X
[6]
Barry H C, 2001, J Am Board Fam Pract, V14, P437
[7]
The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidence [J].
Davies, Karen .
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (02) :78-94
[8]
Delamothe T, 1999, BRIT MED J, V319, P580
[9]
Open access publishing takes off - The dream is now achievable [J].
Delamothe, T ;
Smith, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7430) :1-3
[10]
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests [J].
Edwards, A. G. K. ;
Evans, R. ;
Dundon, J. ;
Haigh, S. ;
Hood, K. ;
Elwyn, G. J. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04)