Effectiveness of a risk-based visitor-prioritizing system at a sexually transmitted infection outpatient clinic

被引:45
作者
Heijman, Titia L. J.
van der Bij, Akke K.
de Vries, Henry J. C.
van Leent, Edwin J. M.
Thiesbrummel, Harold F. J.
Fennema, Han S. A.
机构
[1] Hlth Serv Amsterdam, STI Outpatient Clin, Cluster Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Hlth Serv Amsterdam, HIV & STI Res, Cluster Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
GENITOURINARY MEDICINE; TRIAGE; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1097/01.olq.0000251209.52901.c3
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to study the efficacy/effectiveness of a risk-based visitor-prioritizing system at a sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic aimed to improve screening capacity by providing tailored service. Study Design: In April 2004, a prioritizing system was implemented that classifies visitors as high or low risk depending on reported sexual behavior and previous STI events. The high- and low-risk groups are assigned to standard and short screening protocols, respectively. Both protocols include diagnostic testing for syphilis, urogenital gonorrhea, chlamydia, and optional for HIV. To assess the effectiveness of the system, differences in prevalence of STI diagnoses in the standard and short protocol were analyzed by chi(2) test. Results: In total, 14,391 visitors (64%) received standard screening and 8,056 visitors (36%) received short screening. The STI prevalence in both groups was 18.1% and 7.6%, respectively (P <0.001); prevalence of HIV was 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively (P <0.001). The sensitivity of the prioritizing system was 74%. Specificity was substantially lower (42%). Conclusions: This prioritizing system is effective in differentiating between visitors at high and low risk for STI, contributing to provision of tailored STI service, increasing efficiency, and client access to STI service.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 512
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Maintaining patient access to GUM clinics: is it compatible with appointments?
    Cassell, JA
    Brook, MG
    Mercer, CH
    Murphy, S
    Johnson, A
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2003, 79 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [2] FENNEMA H, 2003, STI CLIN HLTH SERV A
  • [3] Access to genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom
    Foley, E
    Patel, R
    Green, N
    Rowen, D
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2001, 77 (01) : 12 - 14
  • [4] Triage up front
    Handy, P
    Pattman, R
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2005, 81 (01) : 59 - 62
  • [5] LAAR MJW, 2005, HIV SEXUALLY TRANSMI
  • [6] Triage criteria in genitourinary medicine
    Sivapalan, S
    Dale, M
    Brown, C
    Colley, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2005, 16 (09) : 630 - 632
  • [7] Effects of a change from an appointment service to a walk-in triage service at a sexual health centre
    Tideman, RL
    Pitts, MK
    Fairley, CK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2003, 14 (12) : 793 - 795
  • [8] Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches:: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands
    van Bergen, J
    Götz, HM
    Richardus, JH
    Hoebe, CJPA
    Broer, J
    Coenen, AJT
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2005, 81 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [9] van den Hoek J A, 1999, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V143, P668
  • [10] Diagnostic and clinical implications of anorectal lymphogranuloma venereum in men who have sex with men:: A retrospective case-control study
    Van der Bij, AK
    Spaargaren, J
    Morré, SA
    Fennema, HSA
    Mindel, A
    Coutinho, RA
    de Vries, HJC
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 (02) : 186 - 194