Potential impacts of carbon taxes on carbon flux in western Oregon private forests

被引:23
作者
Im, Eun Ho [1 ]
Adams, Darius M. [1 ]
Latta, Gregory S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Resources, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
carbon tax; carbon sequestration; market welfare; marginal costs; cost-effectiveness;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2006.09.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study considers a carbon tax system as a policy tool for encouraging carbon sequestration through modification of management in existing forests and examines its welfare impacts and costs of the carbon sequestered. The simulated carbon tax leads to reduced harvest and increased carbon stock in the standing trees and understory biomass. Changes in the level of silvicultural investments vary by owner, depending on the nature of their initial inventory: In general investment under the tax is concentrated in regimes that establish faster growing plantations. Average rotation age increases, varying in extent across ownerships and site qualities. The carbon tax reduces both consumer and producer surpluses in regional timber markets. Producers are compensated by the carbon subsidies, except at low carbon tax levels. Not all rates of carbon tax will attract interest from private owners if participation is voluntary. Estimates of the marginal cost of sequestering carbon in western Oregon private forests are shown to be within the range of costs for projects considering afforestation alone in some eastern regions of the United States. (C) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1017
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Minimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests [J].
Adams, DM ;
Alig, RJ ;
McCarl, BA ;
Callaway, JM ;
Winnett, SM .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1999, 75 (03) :360-374
[2]  
ADAMS DM, 2006, WEST J APPL FOR, V21, P1
[3]  
ADAMS DM, 2002, RES CONTRIBUTION, V37, P44
[4]   Restoration of the longleaf pine ecosystem on private lands in the US South: an ecological economic analysis [J].
Alavalapati, JRR ;
Stainback, GA ;
Carter, DR .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 40 (03) :411-419
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001
[6]  
Aukland L, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, P123
[7]   A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production [J].
Backéus, S ;
Wikström, P ;
Lämås, T .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 216 (1-3) :28-40
[8]  
BIRDSEY RA, 2003, NE310 USDA FOR SERV, P42
[9]   Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare? [J].
Chomitz, KM .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2002, 2 (01) :35-49
[10]  
CROPPER ML, 1992, J ECON LIT, V30, P675