Comparison of the precision of two vertebral morphometry programs for the Lunar EXPERT-XL imaging densitometer

被引:18
作者
Harvey, SB
Hutchison, KM
Rennie, EC
Hukins, DWL
Reid, DM
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Biomed Phys & Bioengn, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Aberdeen Royal Hosp, Osteoporosis Res Unit, Aberdeen AB25 1GR, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.71.844.9659132
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Comparative precision tests of the vertebral height measurement function of the Aberdeen Vertebral Morphometry System (AVMS) software and Lunar EXPERT-XL software were undertaken using four vertebrae from the same lateral spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) image of the same subject (male, 67 years). Two of the vertebrae were abnormal and two were normal. Three observers inexperienced in morphometry and one experienced observer took part in the study, Repeatability was obtained from IO sequential measurements of the posterior, middle and anterior heights at the same sitting by the same observer. Intraobserver reproducibility compared the means of one set of measurements for all vertebrae with another taken 1 week later. Interobserver reproducibility compared the means of one set of measurements for all vertebrae from an experienced and an inexperienced observer, and from two inexperienced observers. The AVMS software had significantly higher (p<0.05) repeatability (mean coefficient of variability, CV = 3.5%) than the Lunar software (mean CV = 5%), significantly higher (p < 0.01) intraobserver reproducibility (mean CV = 4.6%) than the Lunar software (mean CV = 8.5%), and significantly higher (p < 0.05) interobserver reproducibility (mean CV = 4.7%) than the Lunar software (mean CV = 7.5%). In conclusion, the new AVMS method possessed higher precision when measuring both abnormal and normal vertebrae and when used by both experienced and inexperienced observers.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 398
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*ALD CORP, 1992, ALD DEV DESK
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
BLAND M, 1995, INTRO MED STAT, P265
[4]  
*BRIT STAND I, 1987, PREC TEST METH 1, P5
[5]  
COUNTRYMAN PJ, 1997, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V7, P294
[6]  
CUMMINGS SR, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, P518
[7]  
EASTELL R, 1991, J BONE MINER RES, V6, P207
[8]  
ERGUN D, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, pS370
[9]   A semi-automated computerized system for fracture assessment of spinal x-ray films [J].
Gardner, JC ;
Heyano, SL ;
Yaffe, LG ;
vonIngersleben, G ;
Chesnut, CH .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1996: IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 2710 :996-1008
[10]   VERTEBRAL FRACTURE ASSESSMENT USING A SEMIQUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUE [J].
GENANT, HK ;
WU, CY ;
VANKUIJK, C ;
NEVITT, MC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (09) :1137-1148