Priorities for stroke rehabilitation and research: Results of a 2003 Canadian Stroke Network Consensus Conference

被引:36
作者
Bayley, Mark T.
Hurdowar, Amanda
Teasell, Robert
Wood-Dauphinee, Sharon
Korner-Bitensky, Nicol
Richards, Carol L.
Harrison, Margaret
Jutai, Jeffrey W.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Dept Med, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, St Josephs Hlth Care London, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, London, ON, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Sch Phys & Occupat Therapy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Dept Rehabil, Fac Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Laval, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social Integr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing, Kingston, ON, Canada
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2007年 / 88卷 / 04期
关键词
consensus development conferences; diffusion of innovation; rehabilitation; stroke;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.01.005
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The Canadian Stroke Network Consensus Conference panel met in 2003 in Toronto, Canada, to address areas of stroke rehabilitation that require additional research as well as increased efforts to knowledge translation. The results of an extensive literature review, of a study of factors related to poststroke quality of life, and a survey of clinicians were presented to the panel. From this review, the panel compiled a consensus list of 5 priority areas in stroke rehabilitation research that warrant further investigation. The priorities are: (1) multimodal programs for reintegration into the community; (2) rehabilitation of patients with severe strokes; (3) the ideal timing and intensity of aphasia therapy; (4) cognitive rehabilitation; and (5) and the timing and intensity of rehabilitation after mild-to-moderate stroke. The panel recommended that agencies that fund research create special competitions to support large, multicenter randomized controlled studies to investigate these areas of research. In addition, the panel identified 3 priority areas for knowledge translation where research was convincing: (1) lower-extremity (leg) interventions; (2) upper-extremity (ann) interventions; and (3) detection of clients who are at risk of complications, specifically depression, dysphagia, or cognitive impairment, as well as those at risk for falls and pressure ulcers.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 528
页数:3
相关论文
共 3 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STROKE REHABILITATIO
[2]   Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke [J].
Mayo, NE ;
Wood-Dauphinee, S ;
Côté, R ;
Durcan, L ;
Carlton, J .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (08) :1035-1042
[3]   Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) [J].
Moseley, AM ;
Herbert, RD ;
Sherrington, C ;
Maher, CG .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2002, 48 (01) :43-49