Nitrogen fertilization of trembling aspen seedlings grown on soils of different pH

被引:16
作者
DesRochers, A
van den Driessche, R
Thomas, BR
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Chaire Ind CRSNG UQAT UQAM Amenagement Forestier, Rouyn Noranda, PQ J9X 5E7, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Dept Biol, Victoria, BC V8W 3N5, Canada
[3] New Dendrol Inc, Victoria, BC V8N 1X4, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE | 2003年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X02-191
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Seedlings from three open-pollinated aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) families were grown in a greenhouse with four nitrogen (N) sources, each at two N levels and three pH levels. Nitrogen sources were ammonium sulfate ((NH4)(2)SO4), calcium nitrate (Ca(NO3)(2)), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), and urea ((NH2)(2)CO); N levels were 50 and 200 mg.L-1 (100-mL aliquots three times per week); and pH levels were 5, 6, and 7. Shoot dry mass and leaf area increased with pH in (NH4)(2)SO4 and (NH2)(2)CO treatments, but were greatest at pH 6 in the NH4NO3 and Ca(NO3)(2) treatments as a result of a pH x N source interaction. N level was directly related to growth, net assimilation, water-use efficiency, and leaf carbon isotope ratio, while N source had no effect on these parameters. Seedlings from families 2 and 3 grew larger than seedlings from family 1, which allocated relatively more dry matter to roots. Growth of the three families interacted with soil pH so that family 1 was largest at pH 7, but families 2 and 3 were largest at pH 6. Seedling boron (B) uptake was reduced by increasing pH and by the Ca(NO3)(2) fertilizer. These results were interpreted to show that although the three families seemed well adapted to all the N and pH conditions to which they were exposed, growth could be increased by selection of a fertilizer most suitable to the pH and availability of other nutrients in the soil.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 560
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SOIL SAMPLING METHOD
[2]  
BECKINGHAM JD, 1996, 5 CAN FOR SERV N FOR
[3]  
CHAPPELL HN, 1992, U WASH I FOR RESOUR, V73
[4]  
COYNE PI, 1977, FOREST SCI, V23, P92
[5]  
CZAPOWSKYJ MM, 1979, NE274 USDA FOR SERV
[6]  
DANGERFIELD J, 1979, U WASH I FOR RESOUR, V40, P133
[7]  
ELLIS RC, 1973, NE3 USDA FOR SERV, P174
[8]  
EVERS F. H., 1964, Mitteilungen des Vereins fur Forstliche Standortskartierung, V14, P19
[9]   ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARBON ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION AND THE INTER-CELLULAR CARBON-DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION IN LEAVES [J].
FARQUHAR, GD ;
OLEARY, MH ;
BERRY, JA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 9 (02) :121-137
[10]   Ammonium and nitrate uptake by Eucalyptus nitens:: effects of pH and temperature [J].
Garnett, TP ;
Smethurst, PJ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1999, 214 (1-2) :133-140