An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis

被引:80
作者
Bowles, JB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
来源
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2003 PROCEEDINGS | 2003年
关键词
Risk Priority Number; FMEA; FMECA;
D O I
10.1109/RAMS.2003.1182019
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Risk Priority Number methodology for prioritizing failure modes is an integral part of the Automobile FMECA technique. The technique consists of ranking the potential failures from I to 10 with respect to their severity, probability of occurrence, and likelihood of detection in later tests, and multiplying the numbers together. The result is a numerical ranking, called the RPN, on a scale from 1 to 1000. Potential failure modes having higher RPNs are assumed to have a higher design risk than those having lower numbers. Although it is well documented and easy to apply, the method is seriously flawed from a technical perspective. This makes the interpretation of the analysis results problematic. The problems with the methodology include the use of the ordinal ranking numbers as numeric quantities, the presence of holes making up a large part of the RPN measurement scale, duplicate RPN values with very different characteristics, and varying sensitivity to small changes. Recommendations for an improved methodology are also given.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 386
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
BOWLES JB, 1998, P A REL MAI, P48
[2]   HOW NOT TO LIE WITH STATISTICS - THE CORRECT WAY TO SUMMARIZE BENCHMARK RESULTS [J].
FLEMING, PJ ;
WALLACE, JJ .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1986, 29 (03) :218-221
[3]  
*FORD MOT CO, 1988, POT FAIL MOD EFF AN
[4]  
PALADY P, 1994, 940884 SOC AUT ENG I
[5]  
REAVES CC, 1992, QUANT RES BEH SCI
[6]  
*SOC AUT ENG, 1994, DES FMEA PROC FMEA R
[7]  
*SOC AUT ENG AER R, 2001, 5580 ARP