Pharmacoeconomic analysis of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in the United Kingdom

被引:26
作者
Freeman, H
Arikian, S
Lenox-Smith, A
机构
[1] Wyeth Labs, Dept Med, Taplow SL6 0PH, Berks, England
[2] Univ Oxford Green Coll, Oxford OX2 6HG, England
[3] Analytica Grp, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200018020-00004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the cost effectiveness of different classes of antidepressants in the UK National Health Service. Design, patients and interventions: The use of the serotonin (5-hydroxyhyptamine; 5-HT) and noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine was compared with that of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). A meta-analysis determined the clinical success rate, and a decision tree was constructed by interviewing general practitioners and psychiatrists. Adding pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment costs, meta-analytic rates were applied to the decision tree to calculate the expected cost and outcome for each drug. Cost effectiveness was determined using a composite measure of outcome [symptom-free days (SFD)]. Main outcome measures and results: The meta-analysis included data from 44 studies on 4033 patients. The highest overall efficacy rate for outpatients with MDD was with venlafaxine use (73.7%), compared with 61.4% for SSRIs and 59.3% for TCAs. Treatment with venlafaxine yielded the lowest outpatient cost for a SFD (pound 10.53), compared with pound 13.23 for SSRIs and pound 15.52 for TCAs (1998 values). Conclusions: Using this economic model, venlafaxine appears to be a cost-effective treatment for outpatients with MDD in the UK.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 148
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   RANK-ORDER STABILITY ANALYSIS (ROSA) - TESTING PHARMACOECONOMIC DATA [J].
EINARSON, TR ;
ARIKIAN, SR ;
DOYLE, JJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (04) :367-372
[2]   Comparison of extended-release venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Einarson, TR ;
Arikian, SR ;
Casciano, J ;
Doyle, JJ .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 21 (02) :296-308
[3]   Pharmacoeconomic analysis of venlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder [J].
Einarson, TR ;
Addis, A ;
Iskedjian, M .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1997, 12 (02) :286-296
[4]   The National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys of Great Britain - initial findings from the Household Survey [J].
Jenkins, R ;
Lewis, G ;
Bebbington, P ;
Brugha, T ;
Farrell, M ;
Gill, B ;
Meltzer, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (04) :775-789
[5]   WHAT PRICE DEPRESSION - THE COST OF DEPRESSION AND THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT [J].
JONSSON, B ;
BEBBINGTON, PE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 164 :665-673
[6]   THE COSTS OF DEPRESSION [J].
KIND, P ;
SORENSEN, J .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 7 (3-4) :191-195
[7]   Depression in the community: The first pan-European study DEPRES (Depression Research in European Society) [J].
Lepine, JP ;
Gastpar, M ;
Mendlewicz, J ;
Tylee, A .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 12 (01) :19-29
[8]  
Murray C.J. L., 1996, Burden of Disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020
[9]   A MARKOV PROCESS ANALYSIS COMPARING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF MAINTENANCE THERAPY WITH CITALOPRAM VERSUS STANDARD THERAPY IN MAJOR DEPRESSION [J].
NUIJTEN, MJC ;
HARDENS, M ;
SOUETRE, E .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1995, 8 (02) :159-168
[10]  
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 1997, HLTH DAT 1997