Sedation algorithm in critically ill patients without acute brain injury

被引:173
作者
De Jonghe, B [1 ]
Bastuji-Garin, S
Fangio, P
Lacherade, JC
Jabot, J
Appéré-De-Vecchi, C
Rocha, N
Outin, H
机构
[1] Poissy Hosp, Med Intens Care Unit, Poissy, France
[2] Univ Paris 12, Hop Henri Mondor, Dept Publ Hlth, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
hypnotics; sedatives; respiration; artificial; consciousness; algorithm; intensive care;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000150268.04228.68
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective., To determine whether use of a sedation algorithm to promote a high level of tolerance to the intensive care, environment and preserve consciousness affected time to arousal and duration of mechanical ventilation in patients without acute brain injury. Design: Two-phase, prospective, controlled study. Setting: University-affiliated medical intensive care unit. Patients: Patients without acute brain injury requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hrs. Interventions: During the control phase, sedatives and analgesics were adjusted according to the physician's decision. During the algorithm phase, sedatives and analgesics were adjusted according to an algorithm developed by a multidisciplinary team including nurses and physicians. The algorithm was based on regular assessments of consciousness and tolerance to the intensive care unit environment using the Adaptation to Intensive Care Environment instrument and was designed to achieve tolerance and maintain a high level of consciousness. Standard practices, including weaning from the ventilator, were the same during both study phases. Measurements and Main Results. A total of 102 patients were enrolled (control group, n = 54; algorithm group, n = 48). Median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the algorithm group (4.4 days [interquartile range, 2.1-9.8]) compared with the control group (10.3 days [3.5-17.2], p =.014), representing a 57.3% reduction. In Cox multivariate analysis, the risk of remaining on mechanical ventilation was 0.48 times (95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.78) lower for algorithm patients compared with controls. The median time to arousal was also significantly shorter in patients in the algorithm group (2 days [2-5]) compared with the control group (4 days [2-9], p =.006). Conclusions. The use of a sedation algorithm to promote tolerance to the intensive care environment and preserve consciousness in patients without acute brain injury resulted in a marked decrease in the duration of mechanical ventilation. This reduction was at least partly attributable to a shorter time to arousal after initiation of mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 127
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A double-blind, randomized comparison of IV lorazepam versus midazolam for sedation of ICU patients via a pharmacologic model [J].
Barr, J ;
Zomorodi, K ;
Bertaccini, EJ ;
Shafer, SL ;
Geller, E .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (02) :286-298
[2]   Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: Impact on weaning and costs [J].
BarrientosVega, R ;
SanchezSoria, MM ;
MoralesGarcia, C ;
RobasGomez, A ;
CuenaBoy, R ;
AyensaRincon, A .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (01) :33-40
[3]   PROLONGED SEDATION DUE TO ACCUMULATION OF CONJUGATED METABOLITES OF MIDAZOLAM [J].
BAUER, TM ;
RITZ, R ;
HABERTHUR, C ;
HA, HR ;
HUNKELER, W ;
SLEIGHT, AJ ;
SCOLLOLAVIZZARI, G ;
HAEFELI, WE .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8968) :145-147
[4]   COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS OF GRADUAL WITHDRAWAL FROM VENTILATORY SUPPORT DURING WEANING FROM MECHANICAL VENTILATION [J].
BROCHARD, L ;
RAUSS, A ;
BENITO, S ;
CONTI, G ;
MANCEBO, J ;
REKIK, N ;
GASPARETTO, A ;
LEMAIRE, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 150 (04) :896-903
[5]   Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation [J].
Brook, AD ;
Ahrens, TS ;
Schaiff, R ;
Prentice, D ;
Sherman, G ;
Shannon, W ;
Kollef, MH .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (12) :2609-2615
[6]   ACCUMULATION OF MIDAZOLAM AFTER REPEATED DOSAGE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT [J].
BYATT, CM ;
LEWIS, LD ;
DAWLING, S ;
COCHRANE, GM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6448) :799-800
[7]   PROPOFOL VS MIDAZOLAM IN SHORT-TERM, MEDIUM-TERM, AND LONG-TERM SEDATION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - A COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS [J].
CARRASCO, G ;
MOLINA, R ;
COSTA, J ;
SOLER, JM ;
CABRE, L .
CHEST, 1993, 103 (02) :557-564
[8]   Unplanned extubation:: Risk factors of development and predictive criteria for reintubation [J].
Chevron, V ;
Ménard, JF ;
Richard, JC ;
Girault, C ;
Leroy, J ;
Bonmarchand, G .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (06) :1049-1053
[9]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[10]   Adaptation to the Intensive Care Environment (ATICE):: Development and validation of a new sedation assessment instrument [J].
De Jonghe, B ;
Cook, D ;
Griffith, L ;
Appere-De-Vecchi, C ;
Guyatt, G ;
Théron, V ;
Vagnerre, A ;
Outin, H .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (09) :2344-2354