Objective Image Quality Assessment Based on Support Vector Regression

被引:106
作者
Narwaria, Manish [1 ]
Lin, Weisi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Comp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS | 2010年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
Image quality assessment; image structure; singular value decomposition (SVD); support vector regression (SVR);
D O I
10.1109/TNN.2010.2040192
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Objective image quality estimation is useful in many visual processing systems, and is difficult to perform in line with the human perception. The challenge lies in formulating effective features and fusing them into a single number to predict the quality score. In this brief, we propose a new approach to address the problem, with the use of singular vectors out of singular value decomposition (SVD) as features for quantifying major structural information in images and then support vector regression (SVR) for automatic prediction of image quality. The feature selection with singular vectors is novel and general for gauging structural changes in images as a good representative of visual quality variations. The use of SVR exploits the advantages of machine learning with the ability to learn complex data patterns for an effective and generalized mapping of features into a desired score, in contrast with the oft-utilized feature pooling process in the existing image quality estimators; this is to overcome the difficulty of model parameter determination for such a system to emulate the related, complex human visual system (HVS) characteristics. Experiments conducted with three independent databases confirm the effectiveness of the proposed system in predicting image quality with better alignment with the HVS's perception than the relevant existing work. The tests with untrained distortions and databases further demonstrate the robustness of the system and the importance of the feature selection.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 519
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MODERN IMAGE QUALITY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, LEARNING KERNELS
[4]   Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning [J].
Blum, AL ;
Langley, P .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 97 (1-2) :245-271
[5]   Image quality assessment using a neural network approach [J].
Bouzerdoum, A ;
Havstad, A ;
Beghdadi, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2004, :330-333
[6]  
Callet Patrick Le, FLORENT AUTRUSSEAU S
[7]  
CARRAI P, P IEEE INT S CIRC SY, V5, P253
[8]   VSNR: A wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images [J].
Chandler, Damon M. ;
Hemami, Sheila S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2007, 16 (09) :2284-2298
[9]   Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression [J].
Eckert, MP ;
Bradley, AP .
SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1998, 70 (03) :177-200
[10]   Objective quality assessment of MPEG-2 video streams by using CBP neural networks [J].
Gastaldo, P ;
Rovetta, S ;
Zunino, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2002, 13 (04) :939-947