The auditory motion aftereffect: Its tuning and specificity in the spatial and frequency domains

被引:36
作者
Dong, CJ
Swindale, NV
Zakarauskas, P
Hayward, V
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 3N9, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 2000年 / 62卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03212091
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In this paper, the auditory motion aftereffect (aMAE) was studied, using real moving sound as both the adapting and the test stimulus. The sound was generated by a loudspeaker mounted on a robot arm that was able to move quietly in three-dimensional space. A total of 7 subjects with normal hearing were tested in three experiments. The results from Experiment 1 showed a robust and reliable negative aMAE in all the subjects. After listening to a sound source moving repeatedly to the right, a stationary sound source was perceived to move to the left. The magnitude of the aMAE tended to increase with adapting velocity up to the highest velocity tested (20 degrees/sec). The aftereffect was largest when the adapting and the test stimuli had similar spatial location and frequency content. Offsetting the locations of the adapting and the test stimuli by 20 degrees reduced the size of the effect by about 50%. A similar decline occurred when the frequency of the adapting and the test stimuli differed by one octave. Our results suggest that the human auditory system possesses specialized mechanisms for detecting auditory motion in the spatial domain.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1111
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   EVIDENCE FOR A PHYSIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION OF WATERFALL PHENOMENON AND FIGURAL AFTER-EFFECTS [J].
BARLOW, HB ;
HILL, RM .
NATURE, 1963, 200 (491) :1345-&
[2]   EVIDENCE FOR EXISTENCE OF NEURAL MECHANISMS SELECTIVELY SENSITIVE TO DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT IN SPACE [J].
BEVERLEY, KI ;
REGAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1973, 235 (01) :17-29
[3]   SPATIAL-FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF SPIRAL AFTEREFFECT [J].
BRIGNER, WL .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1982, 55 (03) :1129-1130
[4]   IS VELOCITY OF MOTION AFTEREFFECT PROPORTIONAL TO VELOCITY OF INDUCTION [J].
BRIGNER, WL .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1986, 63 (02) :362-362
[5]   ANTHROPOMETRIC MANIKIN FOR ACOUSTIC RESEARCH [J].
BURKHARD, MD ;
SACHS, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1975, 58 (01) :214-222
[6]   SPATIAL-FREQUENCY SELECTIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE MOTION AFTEREFFECT [J].
CAMERON, EL ;
BAKER, CL ;
BOULTON, JC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1992, 32 (03) :561-568
[7]   MINIMUM AUDIBLE MOVEMENT ANGLE IN THE HORIZONTAL PLANE AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS FREQUENCY AND BANDWIDTH, SOURCE AZIMUTH, AND VELOCITY [J].
CHANDLER, DW ;
GRANTHAM, DW .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (03) :1624-1636
[8]   AUDITORY AFTEREFFECTS FOLLOWING SIMULATED MOTION PRODUCED BY VARYING INTERAURAL INTENSITY OR TIME [J].
EHRENSTEIN, WH .
PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 (10) :1249-1255
[9]  
Finney D.J., 1977, PROBIT ANAL, VIII
[10]   The after-effect of visually observed movement [J].
Gates, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1934, 46 :34-46