Recovery of shoulder joint function after humeral shaft fracture:: a comparative study between antegrade intramedullary nailing and plate fixation.

被引:44
作者
Flinkkilä, T
Hyvönen, P
Siira, P
Hämäläinen, M
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Oulu 90220, Finland
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med, Oulu 90220, Finland
关键词
humeral fractures; intramedullary nailing; internal fixation; functional result; isometric strength;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-004-0727-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Antegrade intramedullary (IM) nailing of humeral shaft fractures is reported to cause shoulder joint impairment. This retrospective study compared shoulder joint symptoms, range of motion (ROM), and isometric strength after antegrade IM nailing and dynamic compression (DC) plating of humeral shaft fractures. Materials and methods: We compared 29 patients with DC plating and 44 with antegrade IM nailing of their humeral shaft fractures. Shoulder pain, L'Insalata and Constant scores, shoulder joint ROM and isometric shoulder strengths were measured after mean follow-up of 6.2 (1-15) years (DC plating) and 5.5 (2-10) years (IM nailing). Results: Patients had nonsignificantly more shoulder pain after IM nailing than after DC plating. Shoulder scores and isometric strength measurements showed no difference between the groups. Flexion was significantly better after DC plating, but none of the other ROM parameters differed between the groups. The shoulder scores and all ROM and strength parameters of the injured side were significantly lower than on the uninjured side in both groups. Conclusions: Shoulder joint ROM and strength does not recover to normal after humeral shaft fracture. Antegrade IM nailing if performed properly is not responsible for shoulder joint impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 541
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures [J].
Ajmal, M ;
O'Sullivan, M ;
McCabe, J ;
Curtin, W .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2001, 32 (09) :692-694
[2]
A QUANTITATIVE HISTOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE VASCULARITY OF THE ROTATOR CUFF TENDON [J].
BROOKS, CH ;
REVELL, WJ ;
HEATLEY, FW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (01) :151-153
[3]
CHANSKY HA, 1991, CLIN SPORT MED, V10, P807
[4]
Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: Intramedullary nails versus plates [J].
Chapman, JR ;
Henley, MB ;
Agel, J ;
Benca, PJ .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (03) :162-166
[5]
Closed humoral shaft fractures: A prospective evaluation of surgical treatment [J].
Chiu, FY ;
Chen, CM ;
Lin, CFJ ;
Lo, WH ;
Huang, YL ;
Chen, TH .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 43 (06) :947-951
[6]
HUMERAL MOBILITY AFTER TREATMENT WITH HANGING CAST [J].
CIERNIK, IF ;
MEIER, L ;
HOLLINGER, A .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1991, 31 (02) :230-233
[7]
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
[8]
Closed interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures with the Russell-Taylor nail [J].
Cox, MA ;
Dolan, M ;
Synnott, K ;
McElwain, JP .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (05) :349-353
[9]
Complications of intramedullary nailing for fractures of the humeral shaft: A review [J].
Farragos, AF ;
Schemitsch, EH ;
McKee, MD .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1999, 13 (04) :258-267
[10]
Functional results of braced humeral diaphyseal fractures; why do 38% lose external rotation of the shoulder? [J].
Fjalestad, T ;
Stromsoe, K ;
Salvesen, P ;
Rostad, B .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2000, 120 (5-6) :281-285