Use of low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease: Answers to frequently asked questions

被引:16
作者
Litin, SC
Heit, JA
Mees, KA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Area Gen Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Hematol & Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Thrombophilia Ctr, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4065/73.6.545
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Low-molecular-weight heparins (LiMWHs) represent an important therapeutic advance in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism. The use of LMWH has potential advantages in comparison with the use of standard unfractionated heparin (UH), including decreased binding to nonanticoagulant-related plasma proteins, greater bioavailability, longer half-life, and lower incidence of the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome; Because of the predictable anticoagulant response of LMWH when administered subcutaneously, laboratory monitoring is unnecessary, and the drug can be used to treat selected patients with venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting. Numerous studies have shown that the treatment of venous thromboembolism with LMWH is as safe and effective as that with standard UH when both are used appropriately. Allied health personnel can easily teach most patients to self-administer LMWH subcutaneously for home use. Transition of the treatment regimen to oral warfarin anticoagulation necessitates an overlap with heparin (UH or LMWH) for at least 1 to 5 days, and the international normalized ratio should ideally be 2.0 or higher for 2 consecutive days before heparin therapy is discontinued. A practical understanding of the pharmacology, risks, and benefits of LMWH in the treatment of venous thromboembolism will enhance the primary-care physician's ability to care for patients safely and cost-effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 551
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis [J].
Brandjes, DPM ;
Buller, HR ;
Heijboer, H ;
Huisman, MV ;
deRijk, M ;
Jagt, H ;
tenCate, JW .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9054) :759-762
[2]  
COHEN JR, 1992, CANCER, V70, P1993, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19921001)70:7<1993::AID-CNCR2820700731>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-V
[4]   USE OF LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN FOR PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF THROMBOEMBOLISM IN PREGNANCY [J].
GILLIS, S ;
SHUSHAN, A ;
ELDOR, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1992, 39 (04) :297-301
[5]   Drug therapy [J].
Ginsberg, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (24) :1816-1828
[6]   Comparison of 5-mg and 10-mg loading doses in initiation of warfarin therapy [J].
Harrison, L ;
Johnston, M ;
Massicotte, MP ;
Crowther, M ;
Moffat, K ;
Hirsh, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (02) :133-136
[7]  
Hirsh J, 1997, SEMIN HEMATOL, V34, P20
[8]  
KESSLER CM, 1995, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V103, P642
[9]  
Kessler CM, 1997, SEMIN HEMATOL, V34, P35
[10]   Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home [J].
Koopman, MMW ;
Prandoni, P ;
Piovella, F ;
Ockelford, PA ;
Brandjes, DPM ;
vanderMeer, J ;
Gallus, AS ;
Simonneau, G ;
Chesterman, CH ;
Prins, MH ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
deHaes, H ;
vandenBelt, AGM ;
Sagnard, L ;
DAzemar, P ;
Buller, HR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (11) :682-687