Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of outcome measurements for schizophrenia -: EPSILON Study 2

被引:62
作者
Knudsen, HC [1 ]
Vázquez-Barquero, JL
Welcher, B
Gaite, L
Becker, T
Chisholm, D
Ruggeri, M
Schene, AH
Thornicroft, G
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Copenhagen Hosp Corp, Inst Prevent Med, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark
[2] Univ Cantabria, Clin & Social Psychiat Res Unit, E-39005 Santander, Spain
[3] Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Leipzig, Dept Psychiat, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ London Kings Coll, Ctr Econ Mental Hlth, London WC2R 2LS, England
[6] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[7] Univ Verona, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[8] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Univ London Kings Coll, Sect Community Psychiat, PRiSM, Inst Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjp.177.39.s8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Research on the comparison of mental health services has identified the need for internationally standardised and reliable measurements. Aims To describe the strategies adopted in the European Psychiatric Services: inputs Linked to Outcome Domains and Needs (EPSILON) Study for the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of five European versions of the instruments. Method A protocol was developed for translation of the outcome scales, describing each step in the translation procedure. Disputed items were discussed in focus groups, which faced seven tasks: a list of topics to be discussed; choosing where the group should meet; composition of participants; conducting the group; data collection; data completion afterwards; reporting results. Results Modifications made to instruments were: changes in the instrument structure, contents and concepts; adjustments to the instrument structure; and modifications to the instrument manual. Conclusion Use of focus groups is an adequate method to apply if concepts, constructs and translation issues are to be addressed; otherwise, less time-consuming methods should be considered. Declaration of interest No conflict of interest. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.
引用
收藏
页码:S8 / S14
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SOC WORK SOC SCI REV
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, CROSS CULTURAL HLTH
  • [3] FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW - AN UNDERUTILIZED RESEARCH TECHNIQUE FOR IMPROVING THEORY AND PRACTICE IN HEALTH-EDUCATION
    BASCH, CE
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1987, 14 (04): : 411 - 448
  • [4] Beecham J., 1992, MEASURING MENTAL HLT, V2nd
  • [5] Bogardus ES, 1926, J APPL SOCIOL, V10, P372
  • [6] Bojlen N S, 1995, Ugeskr Laeger, V157, P3315
  • [7] Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory - European Version: Development of an instrument for international research - EPSILON Study 5
    Chisholm, D
    Knapp, MRJ
    Knudsen, HC
    Amaddeo, F
    Gaite, L
    van Wijngaarden, B
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 177 : S28 - S33
  • [8] Quality of life in schizophrenia:: development, reliability and internal consistency of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile -: European Version -: EPSILON Study 8
    Gaite, L
    Vázquez-Barquero, JL
    Arrizabalaga, AA
    Schene, AH
    Welcher, B
    Thornicroft, G
    Ruggeri, M
    Vázquez-Bourgon, E
    Retuerto, MP
    Leese, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 177 : S49 - S54
  • [9] Gaite L., 1997, Archivos de Neurobiologica, V60, P91
  • [10] SCALED VERSION OF THE GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE
    GOLDBERG, DP
    HILLIER, VF
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1979, 9 (01) : 139 - 145