Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists

被引:52
作者
Reiner, BI
Siegel, EL
Hooper, FJ
Glasser, D
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Vet Adm Maryland Hlth Care Syst, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Amer Radiol Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
computed tomography (CT); image processing; economics; medical; picture archiving and communication system (PACS); radiology and radiologists; departmental management; technologists;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577498
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the relative time required for a technologist to perform a computed tomographic (CT) examination in a "filmless" versus a film-based environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Time-motion studies were performed in 204 consecutive CT examinations. Images from 96 examinations were electronically transferred to a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) without being printed to film, and 108 were printed to film. The time required to obtain and electronically transfer the images or print the images to film and make the current and previous studies available to the radiologists for interpretation was recorded. RESULTS: The time required for a technologist to complete a CT examination was reduced by 45% with direct image to the PACS compared with the time required in the film-based mode. This reduction was due to the elimination of a number of steps in the filming process, such as the printing at multiple window or level settings. CONCLUSION: The use of a PACS can result in the elimination of multiple time-intensive tasks for the CT technologist, resulting in a marked reduction in examination time. This reduction can result in increased productivity, and, hence greater cost-effectiveness with filmless operation.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 485
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BARNES RM, 1966, MOTION TIME STUDY DE
[2]  
Beard D V, 1994, J Digit Imaging, V7, P69
[3]  
FISCHER HW, 1982, RADIOLOGY DEP PLANNI
[4]   IS COST CONTAINMENT FOR REAL [J].
GINZBERG, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 256 (02) :254-255
[5]  
Higgins C W, 1986, Health Care Manage Rev, V11, P21
[6]   ANALYSIS OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PACS [J].
HILSENRATH, PE ;
SMITH, WL ;
BERBAUM, KS ;
FRANKEN, EA ;
OWEN, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (01) :177-180
[7]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF NEWLY DEVELOPED CRT VIEWING STATION - CT READING AND OBSERVERS PERFORMANCE [J].
HIROTA, H ;
SHIMAMOTO, K ;
YAMAKAWA, K ;
ISHIGAKI, T ;
TAKAHASHI, Y ;
SUGIYAMA, N ;
NISHIHARA, E ;
TANI, Y .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1995, 19 (03) :281-285
[8]   INFLUENCE OF CRT WORKSTATION ON OBSERVERS PERFORMANCE [J].
ITOH, Y ;
ISHIGAKI, T ;
SAKUMA, S ;
HIROSE, M ;
FUKATSU, H ;
ITOH, S ;
HORIKAWA, Y ;
SHIMAMOTO, K ;
TADOKORO, T ;
IKEDA, M ;
ITOH, K .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1992, 37 (04) :253-258
[9]   PRODUCTIVITY STANDARDS FOR TECHNOLOGISTS - HOW TO USE THEM [J].
JANOWER, ML .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (01) :276-277
[10]   PRELIMINARY TIME-FLOW STUDY - COMPARISON OF INTERPRETATION TIMES BETWEEN PACS WORKSTATIONS AND FILMS [J].
KATO, H ;
KUBOTA, G ;
KOJIMA, K ;
HAYASHI, N ;
NISHIHARA, E ;
KURA, H ;
AIZAWA, M .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1995, 19 (03) :261-265