Posterior Pedicle Fixation-based Dynamic Stabilization Devices for the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine

被引:75
作者
Bono, Christopher M. [1 ,2 ]
Kadaba, Murali [3 ]
Vaccaro, Alexander R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med,Orthopaed Spine Serv, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2009年 / 22卷 / 05期
关键词
posterior dynamic stabilization; degenerative disk disorders; lumbar spine; facet replacement; motion preservation; ADJACENT-SEGMENT DEGENERATION; POSTEROLATERAL FUSION; MOTION SEGMENTS; DISC DISEASE; FOLLOW-UP; SYSTEM; INSTRUMENTATION; DECOMPRESSION; INSTABILITY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31817c6489
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design: Literature review. Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of the available literature reporting clinical results of using pedicle-based posterior dynamic stabilization systems in the lumbar spine. Methods: A literature search was performed using a number of key words including: posterior dynamic stabilization, facet replacement, pedicle fixation. Results: There is a wide array of pedicle-based, posterior dynamic stabilization systems available. Purported indications are also varied, spanning from degenerative disk disease to reconstruction after laminectomy for spinal stenosis. Short-term and mid-term clinical results of some of these devices are available. For many others, clinical studies are still underway or have just begun. Conclusions: For the spine community to draw sound conclusions that a posterior dynamic device is better than fusion, results from multiple, similarly designed, independently funded trials must be compiled, compared, and contrasted.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 383
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
AWASTHI D, 2005, WORLD SPINE, V3
[2]
Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years - Influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome [J].
Bono, CM ;
Lee, CK .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (04) :455-463
[3]
Bordes-Monmeneu M, 2005, NEUROCIRUGIA, V16, P499
[4]
Surgical results after soft system stabilization of the lumbar spine in degenerative disc disease - Long term results [J].
Brechbuhler, D ;
Markwalder, TM ;
Braun, M .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1998, 140 (06) :521-525
[5]
Posterior dynamic stabiliziation as an alternative for instrumented fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability with spinal stenosis [J].
Cakir, B ;
Ulmar, B ;
Koepp, H ;
Huch, K ;
Puhl, W ;
Richter, M .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2003, 141 (04) :418-424
[6]
Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation - A minimum 5-year follow-up [J].
Cheh, Gene ;
Bridwell, Keith H. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Buchowski, Jacob M. ;
Daubs, Michael D. ;
Kim, Yongjung ;
Baldus, Christy .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2253-2257
[7]
Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients [J].
Chou, WY ;
Hsu, CJ ;
Chang, WN ;
Wong, CY .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2002, 122 (01) :39-43
[8]
COMPARISON OF IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO ADJACENT SEGMENT MOTION AFTER LUMBAR FUSION [J].
DEKUTOSKI, MB ;
SCHENDEL, MJ ;
OGILVIE, JW ;
OLSEWSKI, JM ;
WALLACE, LJ ;
LEWIS, JL .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (15) :1745-1751
[9]
DELAMARTER R, 2006, SPINE J, V6, pS77
[10]
Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis [J].
Gibson, J. N. A. ;
Waddell, G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (04)