Underwater Glider Reliability and Implications for Survey Design

被引:39
作者
Brito, Mario [1 ]
Smeed, David [1 ]
Griffiths, Gwyn [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Oceanog Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Autonomous Analyt, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
Instrumentation; sensors; Risk assessment; Statistical techniques; VEHICLE; SEAGLIDER;
D O I
10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00138.1
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
It has been 20 years since the concept of the Autonomous Ocean Sampling Network (AOSN) was first introduced. This vision has been brought closer to reality with the introduction of underwater gliders. While in terms of functionality the underwater glider has shown to be capable of meeting the AOSN vision, in terms of reliability there is no communitywide hard evidence on whether persistent presence is currently being achieved. This paper studies the reliability of underwater gliders in order to assess the feasibility of using these platforms for future AOSN. The data used are taken from nonunderwater glider developers, which consisted of 205 glider deployments by 12 European laboratories between 2008 and 2012. Risk profiles were calculated for two makes of deep underwater gliders; there is no statistically significant difference between them. Regardless of the make, the probability of a deep underwater glider surviving a 90-day mission without a premature mission end is approximately 0.5. The probability of a shallow underwater glider surviving a 30-day mission without a premature mission end is 0.59. This implies that to date factors other than the energy available are preventing underwater gliders from achieving their maximum capability. This reliability information was used to quantify the likelihood of two reported underwater glider surveys meeting the observation needs for a period of 6 months and to quantify the level of redundancy needed in order to increase the likelihood of meeting the observation needs.
引用
收藏
页码:2858 / 2870
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Oceanographic Field Estimates from Remote Sensing and Glider Fleets [J].
Alvarez, A. ;
Mourre, B. .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 29 (11) :1657-1662
[2]   Optimum Sampling Designs for a Glider-Mooring Observing Network [J].
Alvarez, A. ;
Mourre, B. .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 29 (04) :601-612
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The statistical analysis of failure time data
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Oceanography, DOI DOI 10.5670/OCEANOG.1993.03
[6]   A Behavioral Probabilistic Risk Assessment Framework for Managing Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Deployments [J].
Brito, Mario ;
Griffiths, Gwyn ;
Ferguson, James ;
Hopkin, David ;
Mills, Richard ;
Pederson, Richard ;
MacNeil, Erin .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 29 (11) :1689-1703
[7]   A Markov Chain State Transition Approach to Establishing Critical Phases for AUV Reliability [J].
Brito, Mario Paulo ;
Griffiths, Gwyn .
IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 2011, 36 (01) :139-149
[8]   Risk Analysis for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Operations in Extreme Environments [J].
Brito, Mario Paulo ;
Griffiths, Gwyn ;
Challenor, Peter .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (12) :1771-1788
[9]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[10]   Autonomous underwater vehicles: Trends and transformations [J].
Curtin, TB ;
Crimmins, DM ;
Curcio, J ;
Benjamin, M ;
Roper, C .
MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2005, 39 (03) :65-75