Gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass - Analysis of 3 techniques

被引:122
作者
Gonzalez, R [1 ]
Lin, E [1 ]
Venkatesh, KR [1 ]
Bowers, SP [1 ]
Smith, CD [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Emory Endosurg Unit, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.138.2.181
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: Although perceived as a more technically demanding and time-consuming technique, the handsewn gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Rouxen-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is associated with fewer complications and lower costs than stapled techniques. Design: A retrospective medical record review of prospectively collected data. Setting: University hospital. Patients: One hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2001. Intervention: Three techniques were compared: handsewn anastomosis (HSA), circular-stapled anastomosis (CSA), and linear-stapled anastomosis (LSA). Main Outcome Measures: Operative costs, including the cost of stapling devices, the cost of sutures, and operative times, were compared. Rates of anastomotic strictures, leaks, marginal ulcers, bleeding, and wound infections were determined. Results: Eighty-seven patients underwent HSA; 13, CSA; and 8, LSA. Supply costs per patient were higher for CSA ($955) and LSA ($435) than for HSA ($2) (P<.001). The mean+/-SEM operative time for laparoscopic RYGB was longer when performing CSA than HSA or LSA (285+/-22 vs 215+/-8 and 204+/-28 minutes, respectively; P<.001). Stricture rates were higher after CSA than HSA and LSA (4 [31%] of 13 patients vs 3 [3%] of 87 patients and 0 of 8 patients, respectively; P<.01). The wound infection rate was higher after CSA than HSA and LSA (3 [23%] of 13 patients vs 1 [1%] of 87 patients and 0 of 8 patients, respectively; P<.001). There was no difference in anastomotic bleeding, and no anastomotic leaks occurred. Conclusions: In this experience, hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic RYGB reduced operating room supply costs and was completed faster than stapled techniques. However, these differences may reflect the learning curve because these techniques were used early in our experience. Lower postoperative stricture and wound infection rates seem to be the primary benefits of the HSA technique.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 184
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Gastrojejunal stricture following laparoscopic gastric bypass more likely with circular stapler than hand-sewn anastomosis
    Bradshaw, WA
    Smith, CD
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A491 - A491
  • [2] Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients - What have we learned?
    Higa, KD
    Boone, KB
    Ho, TC
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2000, 10 (06) : 509 - 513
  • [3] Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity - Technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients
    Higa, KD
    Boone, KB
    Ho, TC
    Davies, OG
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2000, 135 (09) : 1029 - 1033
  • [4] Kellum JM, 1998, CURR PROB SURG, V35, P796
  • [5] Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer - A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Law, S
    Fok, M
    Chu, KM
    Wong, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [6] Initial results with a stapled gastrojejunostomy for the laparoscopic isolated Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Matthews, BD
    Sing, RF
    DeLegge, MH
    Ponsky, JL
    Heniford, BT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (06) : 476 - 481
  • [7] Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: A randomized trial
    Nguyen, NT
    Lee, SL
    Goldman, C
    Fleming, N
    Arango, A
    McFall, R
    Wolfe, BM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 192 (04) : 469 - 476
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: A randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs
    Nguyen, NT
    Goldman, C
    Rosenquist, J
    Arango, A
    Cole, CJ
    Lee, SJ
    Wolfe, BM
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 234 (03) : 279 - 289
  • [9] PICHLMAYR R, 1984, THERAPIE MAGENKARZIN, P265
  • [10] Pol B, 1997, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V44, P458