ERS-1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2cm challenge

被引:209
作者
Le Traon, PY [1 ]
Ogor, F [1 ]
机构
[1] CLS Space Oceanog Div, F-31526 Ramonville St Agne, France
来源
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS | 1998年 / 103卷 / C4期
关键词
D O I
10.1029/97JC01917
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The ERS orbit error reduction method using TOPEX/POSEIDON (TIP) data as a reference [Le Traon et al., 1995a] was applied to ERS-1 cycles from phases C, E, F, and G and to the first 16 cycles of the ERS-2 mission (phase A). T/P M-GDR (geophysical data record) (version C) and ERS-1/2 ocean product (OPR) data were used. ERS-1/2 orbits are the D-PAF (processing and archiving facility) orbits and, when necessary, ERS-1/2 altimetric corrections were updated to make the T/P and ERS-1/2. corrections homogeneous. The adjustment method has been refined, and formal error on the estimation is now calculated. The ERS-1/2 orbit error estimation is thus estimated to be precise to within about 2 cm root-mean-square (rms). E-E crossover differences are reduced from 12 to 17 cm to only 6.5 cm rms for all processed cycles. Similarly, the TIP-E crossover differences are reduced from 11 to 14 cm to only 7 cm rms. The adjusted D-PAF orbit error varies between 6 and 12 cm rms. The adjustment has also been performed for the Joint Gravity Model 3(JGM 3) orbits of ERS-1 phases C, E, and F. The rms difference between the corrected orbits for the D-PAF and JGM 3 orbits is only about 1 cm rms, while it is about 11 cm before T/P orbit error correction. This shows that the adjustment is almost insensitive to the initial ERS-1. orbit used. It also confirms the 2 cm precision of the method. We also do repeat-track analysis on the 35 day repeat cycles of ERS-1 phase C. The mean difference in sea level variance before and after orbit error correction is 34 cm(2) (D-PAF orbit) and 17 cm(2) (JGM 3 orbit). The corrected ERS-1 and TIP sea level variabilities, however, are in excellent agreement. The study thus shows that ERS-1/2 orbit error must be corrected before analyzing large-scale oceanic signals and combining ERS-1/2 with T/P data. The proposed method provides a very effective correction and thus significantly enhances the quality of ERS-1/2 data. Corresponding data sets will be distributed to the scientific community by Archiving, Validation, and Interpretation of Satellite Oceanographic Data (AVISO).
引用
收藏
页码:8045 / 8057
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BAROTTO B, 1998, IN PRESS J GUIDANCE
[2]   ERS-1 RADIAL POSITION REFINEMENT BY DUAL CROSSOVER ANALYSIS WITH TOPEX POSEIDON [J].
CARNOCHAN, S ;
MOORE, P ;
EHLERS, S .
ORBIT DETERMINATION AND ANALYSIS, 1995, 16 (12) :119-122
[3]   CORRECTED TABLES OF TIDAL HARMONICS [J].
CARTWRIGHT, DE ;
EDDEN, AC .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1973, 33 (03) :253-264
[4]  
*CTR ERS ARCH TRAI, 1994, C1EXMUTA2101CN
[5]  
*CTR ERS ARCH TRAI, 1996, C2MUTA01IF
[6]  
EANES R, 1995, CSRTM9506 U TEX
[7]   TOPEX/POSEIDON MISSION OVERVIEW [J].
FU, LL ;
CHRISTENSEN, EJ ;
YAMARONE, CA ;
LEFEBVRE, M ;
MENARD, Y ;
DORRER, M ;
ESCUDIER, P .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1994, 99 (C12) :24369-24381
[8]   ESTIMATING THE SEA-STATE BIAS OF THE TOPEX AND POSEIDON ALTIMETERS FROM CROSSOVER DIFFERENCES [J].
GASPAR, P ;
OGOR, F ;
LETRAON, PY ;
ZANIFE, OZ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1994, 99 (C12) :24981-24994
[9]  
GASPAR P, 1994, 922426016C IFREMER
[10]  
GASPAR P, 1996, CLSDOSNT96041